Diseño y validación de un cuestionario de Bienestar Escolar en Educación Primaria

  1. Luisa Losada-Puente 1
  2. Paula Mendiri 1
  3. Nuria Rebollo-Quintela 1
  4. Raúl Fraguela-Vale 1
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

Journal:
Aula abierta

ISSN: 0210-2773

Year of publication: 2024

Issue Title: Nuevas perspectivas sobre validación de instrumentos y escalas en educación

Volume: 53

Issue: 3

Pages: 267-276

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Aula abierta

Abstract

Measuring school well-being allows researchers to get relevant information to know children’s perceptions regarding one of the places where they spend most of their daily life. The aim of the current research was to design and validate an instrument to measure school well-being in Primary Education (CUBE-EP). It was carried out in various stages ending up with its application to a sample of 644 students (49.2% boys, 46.1% girls) from years 4-6. Exploratory (n = 328) and confirmatory (n = 316) analysis were carried out. A model in six correlated dimensions (teachers’ attitude and behaviour, peer relationships, peer conflicts, teachers’ methodology, positive emotions, and negative emotions) was obtained. These dimensions incorporate the 29 items of the final instrument. Factorial invariance by sex was confirmed and compose reliability and average variance extracted were tested. Its psychometric properties make it a useful tool for research and for schools to have a diagnosis of the students’ well-being to organise actions and proposals for improvement.

Bibliographic References

  • Anderson, D. L., y Graham, A. P. (2016). Improving student wellbeing: having a say at school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(3), 348-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1084336
  • Barrance, R. M., y May Hampton, J. M. (2023). The relationship between subjective well-being in school and children’s participation rights: international evidence from the Children’s Wo Worlds survey. Children and Youth Services Review, 151, 107038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107038
  • Buda, M., y Szirmai, E. (2010). School Bullying in the Primary School. Report of a Research in Hajdú-Bihar County (Hungary). Journal of Social Research & Policy, 1(1), 49-68.
  • Casas, F., Bălţătescu, S., Bertran, I., González, M., y Hatos, A. (2013). School satisfaction among adolescents: Testing different indicators for its measurement and its relationship with overall life satisfaction and subjective well-being in Romania and Spain. Social Indicators Research, 111, 665-681. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0025-9
  • Chen, X., Tian, L. y Huebner, E. S. (2020). Bidirectional relations between subjective well‑being in school and prosocial behavior among elementary school‑aged children: A longitudinal study. Child & Youth Care Forum, 49(1), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-019-09518-4
  • Corominas, M., González-Carrasco, M., y Casas, F. (2022). Children’s school subjective well-being: the importance of schools in perception of support received from classmates. Psicología Educativa, 28(2), 99-109. http://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a7
  • Dominguez-Lara, S., y Rodriguez, A. (2017). Índices estadísticos de modelos bifactor. Interacciones, 3(2), 59-65. http://doi.org/10.24016/2017.v3n2.51
  • Dueber, D. M. (2017). Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models [Excel File]. https://doi.org/10.13023/edp.tool.01
  • Elosua, P. (2005). Evaluación progresiva de la invarianza factorial entre las versiones original y adaptada de una escala de autoconcepto. Psicothema, 17(2), 356–362.
  • Fanchini, A., Jongbloed, J., y Dirani, A. (2019). Examining the well-being and creativity of schoolchildren in France. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(4), 391-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1536197
  • Fornell, C., y Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with it Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. http://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Fouquet-Chauprade, B. (2014). Bien-être et ressenti des discriminations à l'école. Une étude empirique en contexte ségrégué. L’Année sociologique, 64(2), 421-444. https://doi.org/10.3917/anso.142.0421
  • Graham, A., Fitzgerald, R., Powell, M. A., Thomas, N., Anderson, D. L., White, N., y Simmons, C. A. (2014). Approaches to wellbeing in schools: what role does recognition play? Executive summary. Centre for Children and Young People, Southern Cross University. https://doi.org/10.4226/47/58eaed4c09218
  • Guimard, P., Bacro, Florin, A., Ferrière, S., Gaudonville, T., y Thanh Ngo, H. (2015). Le bien-être des élèves à l’école et au collège. Validation d’une échelle multidimensionnelle, analyses descriptives et différentielles. Education y formations, 88-89, 163-184.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B., y Anderson, R. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8ª ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Heale, R., y Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursery, 15(3), 66-67. http://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
  • Konu, A., y Rimpelä, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: a conceptual model. Health Promotion International, 17(1), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/17.1.79
  • Lagonell, M. T., Sidera, F., Gras, M., y Mera, D. (2018). Design of a Self-esteem Scale for Schoolchildren: EVA 2015. Universitas Psychologica, 17(4), 1-11. http://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-4.dsss
  • Lévi, J.-P., y Varela, J. (2006). Análisis multivariable para las Ciencias Sociales. McGrawHill.
  • Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 340, de 30 de diciembre de 2020.
  • Ley Orgánica 8/2021, de 4 de junio, de protección integral a la infancia y la adolescencia frente a la violencia. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 134, de 5 de junio de 2021.
  • Liu, W., Tian, L., Huebner, E. S., Zheng, X., y Li, Z. (2015). Preliminary development of the elementary school students’ subjective well-being in school scale. Social Indicators Research, 120, 917-937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0614-x
  • Losada-Puente, L., Mendiri, P., y Rebollo-Quintela, N. (2022). Del bienestar general al bienestar escolar: una revisión sistemática. RELIEVE, 28(1), 1-15 http://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v28i1.23956
  • McLellan, R., y Steward, S. (2015). Measuring children and young people’s wellbeing in the school context. Journal of education, 45(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.889659
  • Mendiri, P., Rebollo-Quintela, N., y Losada-Puente, L. (2024). El bienestar escolar desde la experiencia del alumnado de Educación Primaria. Educar, 60(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1818
  • Moliner, L., Alegre, F., Cabedo-Mas, A., y Chiva-Bartoll, O. (2020). Students’ social well-being at school: Development, validation and analysis of the results of a questionnaire for primary education students. Frontiers in Education, 6, 800248. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.11708949.v1
  • Morata-Ramírez, M. A., Holgado-Tello, F. P., Barbero-García, I., y Mendez, G. (2015). Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio. Recomendaciones sobre Mínimos Cuadrados no Ponderados en función del error Tipo I de Ji-cuadrado y RMSEA. Acción Psicológica, 12(1), 79-90. http://doi.org/10.5944/ap.12.1.14362
  • Muñiz, J., y Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Diez pasos para la construcción de un test. Psicothema, 31(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.
  • Putnick, D. L., y Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
  • Raccanello, D., Vicentini, G., Trifiletti, E., y Burro, R. (2020). A Rasch Analysis of the School-Related Well-Being (SRW) Scale: Measuring Well-Being in the Transition from Primary to Secondary School. International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010023
  • Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W., y Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modelling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
  • Rodríguez, A., Reise, S. P., y Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
  • Sabri, F., Rotheroe, A., y Kazimirski, A. (2015). Measuring the well-being of young people with special educational needs. New Philanthropy Capital.
  • Su, T., Tian, L., y Huebner, E. S. (2019). The reciprocal relations among prosocial behavior, satisfaction of relatedness needs at school, and subjective well-being in school: A three-wave cross-lagged study among Chinese elementary school students. Current Psychology, 40, 3734-3746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00323-9
  • Tian, L., Wang, D., y Huebner, E. S. (2015). Development and Validation of the Brief Adolescents’ Subjective Well-Being in School Scale (BASWBSS). Social Indicators Research, 120, 615-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0603-0
  • Yang, Q., Tian, L., Huebner, E. S., y Zhu, X. (2018). Relations among academic achievement, self-esteem, and subjective well-being in school among elementary school students: A longitudinal mediation model. School Psychology Quarterly, 34(3), 328-340. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/spq0000292
Data source: Dialnet