Tecnologías digitales y ecologías de aprendizajedesafíos y oportunidades

  1. Santos-Caamaño, Francisco-José 1
  2. Vázquez-Cancelo, María-José 1
  3. Rodríguez-Machado, Eduardo-Rafael 1
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña, España
Revista:
Educatio siglo XXI: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1989-466X,  1699-2105

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Ecologías de aprendizaje: oportunidades para la formación en la sociedad en red

Volumen: 39

Número: 2

Páginas: 19-40

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/EDUCATIO.466091 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Educatio siglo XXI: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Resumen

La tecnología ha devenido, hoy en día, un factor primordial de cuyo adecuado empleo depende en gran medida el funcionamiento de los diversos contextos del aprendizaje humano. La teoría ecológica del aprendizaje considera el factor tecnológico como un componente especialmente relevante. Además, las tecnologías digitales están potenciando el desarrollo de nuevas oportunidades de aprendizaje que trascienden las fronteras temporales y geográficas, y propician sistemas que rompen el encorsetamiento de las estructuras de formación formal dando paso a ambientes flexibles, expandidos y diversos desde los que se favorecen mecanismos de aprendizaje informal. Desde esta perspectiva, y de cara a la construcción de tales contextos, resulta conveniente disponer de un marco de referencia paradigmático acerca de las oportunidades que las TIC puedan presentar y, paralelamente, valorar también la problemática asociada a su empleo. Para la identificación de este elenco de affordances tecnológicas, hemos seguido el método Delphi, en cuyo desarrollo han colaborado diversos expertos nacionales e internacionales. El análisis de resultados confirma el papel destacado de los usos tecnológicos en los contextos de aprendizaje actuales, y desvela su funcionamiento en íntima relación con los demás componentes que los integran. Resaltan no solo los aspectos potenciadores del aprendizaje, como son, entre otros, la facilitación de diversas herramientas de comunicación, acceso e intercambio de información, su potencialidad para la creación de vínculos entre personas y comunidades, y la transformación de los roles educativos. Se desvela también la emergencia de ciertas barreras en su empleo, como la ausencia de estrategias de uso. En este sentido, y siempre sobre la base del análisis de la configuración concreta de cada contexto, de sus elementos e interrelaciones, puede manejarse un marco de referencia general de affordances tecnológicas que sirva de guía para el desarrollo de una ecología de aprendizaje auténtica.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adler, M. y Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
  • Akins, R. B., Tolson, H. y Cole, B. R. (2005). Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: Application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC medical research methodology, 5(1), 37. https ://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-37
  • Area, M. y Pessoa, T. (2012). De lo sólido a lo líquido: Las nuevas alfabetizaciones ante los cambios culturales de la Web 2.0. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 38(19), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.3916/c38-2012-02-01
  • Arrigo, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., y Kismihok, G. (2013). Metaanalyses from a collaborative project in mobile lifelong learning. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 222–247. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2011.65206
  • Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Enviroments-the future of eLearning? Elearning papers, 2(1), 1-8. recuperado de https://vcut.org/345.pdf&hl=es&sa=T&oi=gsb-gga&ct=res&cd=0&d=4529383974035248294&ei=2e_gX_qNIo-Ny9YPt6-10Ac&scisig=AAGBfm0z5ta8qbrBLorNie-XD35vp2v5jQ
  • Avella, J. R. (2016). Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 305–421. https ://doi.org/10.28945/ 3561
  • Bakker, A. y Akkerman, S. F. (2014). A boundary-crossing approach to support students’ integration of statistical and work-related knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9517-z
  • Banks, J., Au, K., Ball, A., Bell, P., Gordon, E., Gutierrez, K., Heath, S., Lee, C. Lee. Y., Mahiri, J., Nasir, N., Valdés, G. y Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments. Life-long, Life-wide, Life-deep. (Consensus Report). Learning in Informal and Formal Environment (LIFE) Center. Recuperado de http://life-slc.org/docs/Banks_etal-LIFE-Diversity-Report.pdf
  • Barab, S. A. y Roth, W. M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational researcher, 35(5), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005003
  • Barron, B. (2006a). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human development, 49(4), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368
  • Barron, B. (2006b). Configurations of Learning Settings and Networks - Implications of a Learning Ecology Perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 229-231. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094370
  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity
  • Becket, D. y Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning. Practice in postmodernity. New York: Routledge
  • Billet, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest (Australia): Allen y Unwin
  • Boyer, S., Edmonson, D., Artis, A, y Fleming, D. (2014). Self-Directed Learning. A Tool for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 36, 20-32, https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313494010
  • Brown, J. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2),11-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380009601719
  • Bull, G., Thompson, A., Searson, M., Garofalo, J., Park, J., Young, C. y Lee, J. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning: Experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 100-107. Recuperado de https://www.learntechlib.org/p/29328/
  • Çetinkaya, L. y Keser, H. (2018). Adaptation of interaction in web environments with educational content. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(3), 142–152. https ://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v10i3.3555
  • Charro E. (2020). A curricular Delphi study to improve the science education of secondary school students in Spain. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 282-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21655
  • Cilliers, P. (2005). Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 255–267. https ://doi.org/10.1177/02632 76405 058052
  • Cyphert, F. R. y Gant, W. L. (1971). The Delphi technique: A case study. Phi Delta Kappa, 52, 272–273
  • Dabbagh, N. y Castaneda, L. (2020). The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3041-3055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09831-z
  • Dans, I., Fuentes, E. J., González-Sanmamed, M. y Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2021). El reto de los profesores de secundaria ante las redes sociales. Educar, 57(1), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1151
  • Dans, I., González-Sanmamed, M. y Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2019). Redes sociales, adolescencia y familia: desafíos y oportunidades. Publicaciones, 49(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v49i2.8527
  • Day, J. y Bobeva, M. (2005). A generic toolkit for the successful management of Delphi studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 103–116. Recuperado de from http://www.ejbrm.com/volum e3/issue 2/p103
  • De la Selva, A. (2015). Los nuevos rostros de la desigualdad en el siglo XXI: la brecha digital. Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, 60(233), 265-285.
  • Donohoe, H., Stellefson, M. y Tennant, B. (2012). Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique: Implications for health education researchers. American Journal of Health Education, 43(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325 037.2012.10599216
  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non‐formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British journal of educational psychology, 70(1), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158001
  • Estévez, I. (2020). Análisis del desarrollo profesional del docente universitario de Ciencias de la Salud a través de las Ecologías de Aprendizaje [Tesis no publicada]. Universidade da Coruña
  • Foresto E. (2020). Aprendizajes formales, no formales e informales. Una revisión teórica holistica. Contextos de Educación 29 (21). Recuperado de http://www2.hum.unrc.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/contextos/article/download/1142/1234
  • García-Martínez, J. G. y González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Cómo generan y gestionan contenidos los estudiantes de educación de Costa Rica: una contribución al estudio de su entorno personal de aprendizaje. Digital Education Review, (36), 15-35. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7282526.pdf
  • Gibson, J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • González-Sanmamed, M., Estévez, I., Souto-Seijo, A. y Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2020). Ecologías digitales de aprendizaje y desarrollo profesional del docente universitario. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 28(62), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-01
  • González‐Sanmamed, M., Muñoz‐Carril, P.C. y Santos‐Caamaño, F. J. (2019). Key components of learning ecologies: A Delphi assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1639-1655. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/bjet.12805
  • González-Sanmamed, M., Souto-Seijo, A., González, I. y Estévez, I. (2019). Aprendizaje informal y desarrollo profesional: análisis de las ecologías de aprendizaje del profesorado de educación infantil. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (68), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.68.1305
  • Gouthro, P. A. (2017): The promise of lifelong learning, International. Journal of Lifelong Education, 36 (1-2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2017.1270067
  • Hasson, F., Keeney, S. y McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. https ://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
  • Jackson, N. J. (2013). The Concept of Learning Ecologies. En N.J. Jackson y G. B. Cooper (Eds.), Lifewide Learning Education and Personal Development (pp.1-21). [E-book]. Recuperado de http://www.lifewideebook.co.uk/uploads/1/0/8/4/10842717/chapter_a5.pdf
  • Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, lifelong learning, and the learning society: Sociological Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge
  • Jarvis, P. (2014). From adult education to lifelong learning and beyond. Comparative Education, 50(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.871832
  • Kalantzis, M., y Cope, B. (2015). Learning and new media. En D. Scott and E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sage handbook of learning (pp. 373-387). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Keeney, S., Hasson, F. y McKenna, H. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https ://doi.org/10.1002/97814 44392029.
  • Kek, M. y Huijser, H. (2017). Problem-based learning into the future. Imagining an agile PBL ecology for learning. Singapore: Springer
  • Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  • Linstone, H. A. y Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  • Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Adults' Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps, and Future Research. NALL Working Paper #21. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452390.pdf
  • López-Gómez, E. (2018). El método Delphi en la investigación actual en educación: una revisión teórica y metodológica. Educación XXI, 21(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.5944/educx x1.20169
  • Luckin, R. (2008). The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.018
  • Maina, M. F. y González, I. G. (2016). Articulating personal pedagogies through learning ecologies. En B. Gros, Kinshuk y M. Maina (Eds.), The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies (pp. 73-.94). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_5
  • Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A., Giancaspro, M. y Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: a research review. International journal of training and development, 19(1), 1-17. Recuperado de http://www.academia.edu/download/44528973/Formal_and_informal_learning_in_the_work20160408-3135-10ztkix.pdf
  • Mason R. y Rennie F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge
  • McIntyre-Hite, L. (2016). A Delphi study of effective practices for developing competency-based learning models in higher education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1, 157–166. https ://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1029
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A. y Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage
  • Mirata, V., Hirt, F., Bergamin, P. y Van der Westhuizen, C. (2020). Challenges and contexts in establishing adaptive learning in higher education: findings from a Delphi Study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00209-y
  • Mohr, S. C. y Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24059/ olj.v21i4.1273
  • Nardi, B. (1996). Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. En B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Nasir, N. I. S. y Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41-61.https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x
  • Okoli, C. y Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
  • Plesch, C., Kaendler, C., Rummel, N., Wiedmann, M. y Spada, H. (2013). Identifying areas of tension in the field of technology-enhanced learning: Results of an international Delphi study. Computers & Education, 65, 92–105. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.compe du.2013.01.018
  • Pozzi, F., Manganello, F., Passarelli, M., Persico, D., Brasher, A., Holmes, W.,Whitelock, D. & Sangrà, A. (2019). Ranking Meets Distance Education: Defining Relevant Criteria and Indicators for Online Universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4391
  • Prestridge, S. (2018). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143-158. https://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003
  • Renon, F. (2013). Personal learning environments (PLEs): ecologies for building student capability for lifelong learning. Recuperado de https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/frp/27423.pdf
  • Rogoff, B., Callanan, M., Gutiérrez, K. D. y Erickson F. (2016). The Organization of Informal Learning. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 356-401. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16680994
  • Romeu-Fontanillas, T., Guitert-Catasús, M., Raffaghelli, J. E. y Sangrà, A. (2020). Ecologías de aprendizaje para usar las TIC inspirándose en docentes referentes. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 28(62), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-03
  • Rowe, G. y Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. California: Sage
  • Sangrà, A., González-Sanmamed, M. y Guitert, M. (2013). Learning ecologies: Informal professional development opportunities for teachers. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1/201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CICEM.2013.6820171
  • Sangrà, A., Raffaghelli, J. & Guitert, M. (2019). Learning ecologies through a lens: Ontological, methodological and applicative issues. A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET), 50(4), 1619-1638, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12795
  • Santos-Caamaño, F. J. (2019). Ecologías de aprendizaje en la formación de los futuros mestros [Tesis no publicada]. Universidade da Coruña
  • Shaikh, Z. A. y Khoja, S. A. (2014). Personal learning environments and university teacher roles explored using Delphi. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 202–226. https ://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.324
  • Sharar, B. (2016). Emergent Pedagogy in England: A Critical Realist Study of Structure-Agency Interactions in Higher Education. Nueva York, NY: Routledge
  • Skulmoski, G., Hartman, F. y Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1–21, https ://doi.org/10.28945/ 199
  • Stevens, R., Bransford, J. y Stevens, A. (2005). The LIFE Center’s lifelong and lifewide diagram. Retrieved from http://life-slc.org/about/about.htm
  • Ventimiglia, P. y Pullman, G. (marzo de 2016). From written to digital: The new literacy. EDUCAUSE Review. Recuperado de https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/articles/2016/3/erm1623.pdf.
  • Widodo, A., Maria, R. A y Fitriani, A. (2017). Constructivist learning environment during virtual and real laboratory activities. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/ 10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i1.7959
  • Williams, R., Karousou, R. y Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 39–59. https ://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.883
  • Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K. y Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK—practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707–722. https ://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078
  • Zimmerman, B. J. y Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2012). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New york, NY:Springer
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet