Efectos del entrenamiento en conciencia fonológica y velocidad de denominación sobre la lectura. Un estudio longitudinal

  1. González Seijas, Rosa María 1
  2. Cuetos Vega, Fernando 2
  3. López Larrosa, Silvia 1
  4. Vilar Fernández, Juan 1
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
ESE: Estudios sobre educación.

ISSN: 1578-7001

Año de publicación: 2017

Número: 32

Páginas: 155-177

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15581/004.32.155-177 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: ESE: Estudios sobre educación.

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Existen una serie de predictores que contribuyen directamente a la precisión y a la velocidad lectora. En este trabajo se analizan los efectos que un programa de instrucción en dos de dichos predictores, “conciencia fonológica” y “velocidad de denominación”, tienen sobre el aprendizaje de la lectura. Los participantes fueron 326 escolares (171 del grupo experimental y 155 del grupo control) que cursaban 2º y 3º de educación infantil y primero de primaria al comenzar la instrucción. Procedían de cuatro colegios (dos públicos y dos concertados). El grupo experimental recibió entrenamiento explícito en conciencia fonológica y velocidad de denominación durante tres cursos, dos días a la semana. El grupo control siguió el plan curricular oficial. El grupo experimental obtuvo puntuaciones significativamente más altas que el grupo control en las pruebas de conciencia fonológica y denominación rápida, y obtuvo mejores puntuaciones en tareas de lectura en los tres primeros cursos de primaria. Los resultados indican que la intervención explícita mejora la precisión y velocidad en la lectura de palabras y de pseudopalabras y orientan la intervención en el aula.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Este artículo ha sido realizado dentro de un proyecto de investigación (ref: 08sec00106pr)

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aarnoutse, C., van Leeuwe, J. y Verhoeven, L. (2005). Early literacy from a longitudinal perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(3), 253-275.
  • Aguilar, M., Navarro, J., Menacho, I., Alcale, C., Marchena, E. y Ramiro, P. (2010). Velocidad de nombrar y conciencia fonológica en el aprendizaje inicial de la lectura. Psicothema, 22(3), 436-442.
  • Caravolas, M., Volín, J. y Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and less consistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107-139.
  • Castles, A. y Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77-111.
  • Clarke, P., Hulme, C. y Snowling, M. (2005). Individual differences in RAN and reading: A response timing analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(2), 73-86.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E. y Arribas, D. (2007). Prolec-R, Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores. Madrid: TEA.
  • Denckla, M. B. y Rudel, R., (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychology,14, 471479.
  • De Jong, P. y van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological defi cit in dyslexic children learning to read in a regular orthography. Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25, 22-49.
  • Defior, S. y Serrano, F. (2011). La conciencia fonémica, aliada de la adquisición lenguaje escrito. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 31(1), 2-13.
  • Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, fi ndings, issues. Scientifi c Studies of Reading, 9, 167-188.
  • Fielding-Barnsley, R. (2010). Australian pre-service teachers’ knowledge of phonemic awareness and phonics in the process of learning to read. Australian Journal of Learning Diffi culties, 15, 99-110.
  • Frost, J., Madsbjerg, S., Neidersøe, J., Olofsson, A. y Sørenson, P. M. (2005). Semantic and phonological skills in predicting reading development: From 3-16 years of age. Dyslexia, 11, 79-92.
  • Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., Kirby, J. y Stephenson, K. (2008). Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and reading. Scientifi c Studies of Reading, 12, 325-350.
  • Georgiou, G., Parrila, R. y Liao, C. H. (2008). Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 885-903.
  • Gillon, G. T. (2000). The effi cacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 126-141.
  • Gillon, G. (2005). Facilitating phoneme awaresness development in 3 and 4 year old children with speech impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 308-324.
  • Herrera, L. y Defi or, S. (2005). Una aproximación al procesamiento fonológico de los niños prelectores: conciencia fonológica, memoria verbal a corto plazo y denominación. Psykhe, 14(2), 81-95.
  • Hindson, B., Bryne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., Newman, C., Hine, D. y Shankweiler, D. (2005). Assessment and early instruction of preschool children at risk for reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 687-704.
  • Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T. y Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 401-413.
  • Jiménez, J. E. y Ortiz, M. R. (2000). Conciencia metalingüística y adquisición lectora en la lengua española. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 37-46.
  • Justice, L. M., Chow, S., Capellini, C., Flanigan, K. y Colton, S. (2003). Emergent literacy intervention for vulnerable pre-schoolers: Relative effects of two approaches. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 320-332.
  • Koutsoftas, D., Harmon, T. y Gray, S. (2009). The effect of Tier 2 intervention for phonemic awareness in a response-to-intervention model in low-income preschool classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 116-130.
  • Landerl, K. y Wimmer, H. (2000). Defi cits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: evidence from German and English children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 243-262.
  • Landerl, K. y Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fl uency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150-161.
  • Lepola, J., Poskiparta, E., Laakkonen, E. y Niemi, P. (2005). Development of and relationship between phonological and motivational processes and naming speed in predicting word recognition in Grade 1. Scientifi c Studies of Reading, 9, 367-399.
  • Leppanen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K. y Nurmi, J. E. (2006). Development of reading and spelling Finnish from preschool to Grade 1 and Grade 2. Scientifi c Studies of Reading, 10, 3-30.
  • Lopez-Escribano, C. y Katzir, T. (2008). Are phonological processes separate from the processes underlying naming speed in a shallow orthography? Education Psychology, 16, 641-666.
  • López-Escribano, C. y Beltrán, J. (2009). Early predictors of reading in three groups of native Spanish speakers: Spaniards, Gypsies, and Latin Americans. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1) 84-95.
  • Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M. y Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325-333.
  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J. y Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 665−681.
  • Nancollis, A., Lawrie, B. y Dodd, B. (2005). Phonological awareness intervention and the acquisition of literacy skills in children from deprived social backgrounds. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 325-335.
  • National Early Literacy Panel. (2006). Findings from the National Early Literacy Panel: Providing a focus for early language and literacy development. Louisville, KY: Presentation at the annual conference of the National Center for Family Literacy.
  • National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
  • Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C. y Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 1-17.
  • Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R. y Mcquarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, nam ing speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development? Scientifi c Studies of Reading, 8(1), 3-26.
  • Plaza, M. y Cohen, H. (2007). The contribution of phonological awareness and visual attention in early reading and spelling. Dyslexia, 13, 67-76.
  • Ramos, J. L. y Cuadrado, I. (2006). Prueba para la Evaluación del Conocimiento Fonológico. PECO. Madrid: EOS.
  • Ryder, J., Tunmer, W. y Greaney, K. (2008). Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms. Reading and Writing, 21, 349-369.
  • Savage, R. y Frederickson, N. (2005). Evidence of a highly specifi c relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed. Brain and Language, 93(2), 152-159.
  • Schuele, C. M. y Boudreau, D. (2008). Phonological awareness intervention: Beyond the basics. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 3-20.
  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M. y Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174.
  • Suárez-Coalla, P., García-Castro, M. y Cuetos, F. (2013). Variables predictoras de la lectura y la escritura en castellano. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36, 77-89.
  • Sunseth, K. y Bowers, P. G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling, and orthographic knowledge. Scientifi c Studies of Reading, 6, 401-429.
  • Thomson, J. y Hogan, T. (2009). Future advances in the early detection of reading risk: Subgroups, dynamic relations, and advanced methodologies. Epilogue Special Edition “Advances in the Early Detection of Reading Risk”. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(4), 383-386.
  • Vaessen, A. A. y Blomert, L. (2010). Long-term cognitive dynamics of fl uent reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 213-231.
  • Van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. H. J. y Spelberg, H. C. (2002). Life-Span data on continuous naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word-reading speed. Scientifi c Studies of Reading, 6, 25-49.
  • Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G. y Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
  • Wolf, M. y Denckla, M. (2005). The rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests. Austin, Texas: Proed.
  • Yuste, C. (2005). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales, BADyG-I y BADyG-E1. Madrid: CEPE.
  • Ziegler, J. C. y Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29.
  • Ziolkowski, R. y Goldstein, H. (2009). Effects of an embedded phonological awareness intervention during repeated book reading on preschool children with language delays. Journal of Early Intervention 31, 67-90.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet