Evaluación AGREE-II de guías de práctica clínica sobre radiodermatitis agudaAGREE-II evaluation of clinical practice guidelines in acute radiodermatitis

  1. José María Rumbo Prieto 1
  2. Juan Santiago Cortizas Rey 2
  3. Rafael Lago López 3
  4. Mercedes Cabanas Polo 4
  5. Paula Pérez Villaverde 5
  6. Javier Sánchez Gálvez 6
  1. 1 Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol
    info

    Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol

    Ferrol, España

  2. 2 Gerencia de Gestión Integrada de Ferrol.
  3. 3 Hospital A. Marcide de Ferrol.
  4. 4 Hospital Juan Cardona de Ferrol.
  5. 5 Hospital del Mar- Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona.
  6. 6 Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCA
Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
Enfermería Dermatológica

ISSN: 1888-3109,  2386-4818

Ano de publicación: 2017

Ano: 11

Número: 30

Páxinas: 50-56

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Enfermería Dermatológica

Resumo

Objective: To evaluate and compare the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on prevention and treatment of acute radiodermatitis (RD). Methodology: Evaluation of methodological quality through the AGREE-II instrument. Search for CPG in specialized sources. Selection of CPGRD with an age of no more than 5 years. Review by three evaluators. Results: Of seven localized CPGs, 3 (two Mexican and one Canadian) were selected. The average quality achieved was 59% (sufficient quality). The first domain (scope and objective), obtained a good quality score (>75%), being the “worst” domain 5 (applicability) that was considered “low quality” (<50%) In all CPGGs evaluated. The rest of the domains achieved a sufficient quality (57.7%). A CPG was rated as “not recommended”, and no CPG was considered “highly recommended” by the reviewers. Conclusions: The CPG Mexicana of the IMSS and the Canadian GPC of the group MASCC, were considered as “recommended with conditions”; should improve key aspects such as: use a scale of evidence of greater methodological rigor, update the recommendations of evidence, include a viable implementation process and specify the editorial independence of the CPG.

Fonte de datos: Dialnet