Desempeño económico y atractivo de los puertos españoles en el mar Mediterráneo

  1. Fernando González Laxe 1
  2. José Picatoste 1
  3. Isabel Novo Corti 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Economía Instituto Universitario de Estudios Marítimos Universidade da Coruna
Revista:
Anuario de estudios marítimos

ISSN: 2792-9698

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 1

Páginas: 171-191

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Anuario de estudios marítimos

Resumen

Los puertos han ido modificando tanto sus características como sus funciones a medida que avanzaban los procesos de integración económica. Estas modificaciones surgen con una doble lógica: la de atraer mayores flujos de mercancías y la de regular o realizar los servicios portuarios asociados. Nuestra aportación se centra en medir la capacidad de atractivo de los puertos, a través del análisis del caso de los puertos españoles en el Mediterráneo. Se lleva a cabo empleando un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Los resultados obtenidos subrayan las particularidades intrínsecas de cada puerto. También enfatiza las nuevas funciones y orientaciones de los puertos en la nueva era económica posterior al COVID-19. Las relaciones causales que se muestran en este documento podrían ayudar a los administradores de los puertos a tomar decisiones adecuadas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BAGOZZI, R. P., & YI, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science. 16(1): 74-94.1988.
  • BAIRD. A. (2000). Port privatisation: objectives, extent, process and the UK experience. International Journal of Maritime Economics. 2.177-194. https://doi.org/10.1057/ijme.2000.16.
  • BOURDIN, S., CORNIER, T. (2015). De la polarisation du trafic de conteneurs à la concentration spatiale : l´exemple des ports d´Europe et de la Méditerranée. Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport. 68/2015.27-56.
  • BROOKS, M., (2000). Sea change in liner shipping: regulation and managerial decisiónmaking in a global industry. Oxford Elsevier.
  • CASCHILI, S., MEDDA, F. (2015). The port attractitivennes index: application on African Ports. Région et Dévelopment. 41: 47-82.
  • DE LANGE, P. (2007). Port competition and selection in constestable hinterlands: the case of Austria. European Journal of Transport and Infraestructure Research. 7 (1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2007.7.1.3370.
  • DE MARTINO, M., MORVILLO, A. (2008). Activities, resources and inter.-organizational relationships: key factors in port competitiveness. Maritime Policy & Management. 35 (6): 571-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830802469477.
  • ESCOBEDO PORTILLO, M. T., HERNÁNDEZ GÓMEZ, J. A., ESTEBANÉ ORTEGA, V., & MARTÍNEZ MORENO, G. (2016). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: Características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Ciencia & Trabajo, 18 (55): 16-22, https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-24492016000100004.
  • FORNELL, C., & LARCKER, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
  • FRASE, D., NOTTEBOOM, T. (2014). A strategic appraisal of the attractiveness of seaport-based transport corridors: The Southern African case. Journal of Transport Geography. 36: 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.010.
  • GOHOMENE, D. A., YANG, Z. L., BONSAL, S., MAISTRALIS, E., WANG, J., & LI, K. X. (2016). The Attractiveness of Ports in W est A frica: Some Lessons from Shipping Lines’ Port Selection. Growth and Change, 47(3), 416-426.
  • GONZÁLEZ-LAXE, F., FREIRE, M. J., PAIS, C. (2015). Port Policy and Port Choice: The Spanish case. International Journal of Transport Economcis. 42(2): 529-553.
  • GUY, E., & URLI, B. (2006). Port selection and multicriteria analysis: An application to the Montreal-New York alternative. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8(2), 169-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100152.
  • HA, M. (2003). A comparison of service quality at major container ports: implications for Korean ports. Journal of Transport Geography, 11 (2): 131-137.
  • HAIR, J. F., ANDERSON, R. E., TATHAM, R. L., & BLACK, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante (Vol. 491). Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • HUYBRECHTS, M., MEERSMAN, H., VAN DE VOORDE, E., VAN HOOYDONK, E., Verbeke, A, Winkelmans, W. (2002). Port competitiveness: an economic and legal analysis of the factors determining the competitiveness of Sea-Ports. Antwerp. Ed De Boeck.
  • JELAVIĆ, V., BRAJOVIĆ, M., & ĐURĐEVIĆ-TOMAŠ, I. (2008). Analyses of State and Density of Traffic in the Port of Dubrovnik-Gruz. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 20 (3): 189-193.
  • JÖRESKOG, K. G. (1967). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis, ETS Res. Bull. Ser. doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1967.tb00991.x.
  • JÖRESKOG, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. Goldberger, A. S., Duncan, O. D., Eds.. Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, pp. 85-112.
  • KOVAČIĆ, M., LUKOVIĆ, T., & DUNDOVIĆ, Č. (2008). Normative Conditions-Logistics Factor of Development of Ports for Nautical Tourism. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 20 (3): 201-208.
  • LIRN, T. C., THANAPOULOU, H., BERESFORD, A., Anthony, K. C. (2003). Transhipment port selection and decision-making behaviour: analysis the Taiwanese case. International Journal of Logistics Research and Application, 6(4): 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001626990.
  • LIRN, T. C., THANOPOULOU, H. A., BEYNON, M. J., BERESFORD, A. K. C. (2004). An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: a global perspective. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6: 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093.
  • MALCHOW M. B., KANAFANI, A. (2004). A disaggregate analysis of port selection. Transportation Research Part E, 40: 317-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2003.05.001.
  • MANDAL, B. (2015). Distance, production, virtual trade and growth: A note. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 9(2015-1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-1.
  • MARECK. R. (2018). The evaluation of the attractiveness of marine container terminal sector: analyzing the polish sector. SHS Web of Conference 58, 01018. https://doi.org/10.105/shscon/20185801018.
  • MERK, O. (2015). The competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: Synthesis report. OECD.
  • NJØS, R., SJØTUN, S. G., JAKOBSEN, S. E., & FLØYSAND, A. (2020). Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography, 96(3), 266-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768.
  • NG, K. Y. (2007). Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: an agenda for future research in the port competition. Maritime Economics Logistics, 8(3): 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100158.
  • NOTTEBOOM, T. (2009). Path dependence and contingency in the development of multi-port gateay regions and multi-port hub regions. In Port in Proximity Competiiton and Coordination among adjacent Seaports. Farham Ashgate. 55-72.
  • NOTTEBOOM, T. (2016). Te adaptative capacity of container port in a era of mega-vessels: the case of upstream seaports Antwerp and Hamburg. Journal of Transport Geography. 54.295-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.002.
  • NOTTEBOOM, T., RODRIGUE, J. P. (2012). The Corporate Geography of Global Container Terminals Operators. Maritine Policy and Management. 39 (3): 249-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.671970.
  • NOTTEBOOM, T., PAROLA, F., SATTA. G., PALLIS, A. A. (2017). The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping. Journal of Transport Geography, 64: 158-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.09.002.
  • OECD. (2008). Port competition and Hinterland connections. ITF/OCDE. Discussion paper 20008/19. Paris.
  • PAROLA, F., RISITANO, M., FERRETI, M., PANETTI, E. (2017). The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review. Transport Reviews 37(1): 116-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1231232.
  • RODRIGUE, J. P., COMTOIS, C., SLACK, B. (2013. The geography of transport systems, London, Routledge.
  • SONG, D. W., YEO, K. T. (2004). A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports using the Analysis Hierarchy Process. Maritime Economics and Logistics. 6: 34-52 https://doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100096.
  • TONGZON, J. L. (2002). Port choice determinants in a competitive environment, Proceedings IAME. Panamá.
  • TONGZON, J. L. (2009). Port choice and freight forwarders. Transportation Research Part E., 45(1): 186-195. https://doi:10.1016/j.tre.2008.02.004.
  • TULJAK-SUBAN, D., TWRDY, E. (2008). Decision support for optimal repositioning of containers in a feeder system. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 20(2): 71-77.
  • UGBOMA, C., UGBOMA, O., OGWUDE, I. C. (2006). An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach to port selection decisions-empirical evidence from Nigerian Ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics. 8 (3): 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100160.
  • UNCTAD. (2018). Verhoeven Coference on Trade and Development. Informe sobre el transporte marítimo, Available online on https://unctad.org/es/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2018_es.pdf. Visited on April, 30th 2020.
  • VERHOEVEN, P. (2010). A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance?, Maritime Policy and Management, 37(3): 247-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088831003700645.
  • WESCHENFELDER, M. (2015). The Brazilian port infrastructure attractiveness for private investors. MSc in Maritime Economics and Logistics, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  • WIEGMANS, B. W., VAN DER HOEST, A., NOTTEBOOM, T. (2008). Port and Terminal Selection by deep-sea container operators. Maritime Policy and Management. 35(6). 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830802469329.
  • WRIGHT, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. The annals of mathematical statistics, 5(3): 161-215. https://doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732676.
  • WRIGHT, S. (1936). Path coefficients and path regressions: Alternative or complementary concepts?, Biometrics, 16: 189-202.
  • YEO, G. T., NG, A. K., LEE, P. T., YANG, Z. (2014). Modelling port choice in an uncertain environment, Maritime Policy and Management, 41(3): 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.839515.
  • YEO, G. T., ROE, M., & DINWOODIE, J. (2008). Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(6): 910-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.014.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet