The Internet at the Service of Societybusiness Ethics, Rationality, and Responsibility

  1. González, Wenceslao J. 1
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

Revista:
Endoxa: Series Filosóficas

ISSN: 1133-5351

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Ensayos en honor de Eloy Rada García

Número: 46

Páginas: 383-412

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/ENDOXA.46.2020.28029 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Endoxa: Series Filosóficas

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Serving the community is what the Internet — in the broad sense — does in many ways, within the knowledge society. The layers of its ontological structure — technology infrastructure, the Web, and the cloud computing and practical applications (apps) — are in principle at the service of society. This service is carried out by companies, which are ethically assessable insofar as they are “social subjects.” Their public service purpose at the three layers during the coronavirus lockdown is considered here.Within a framework of business ethics, this article looks deeply at companies as “social subjects.” They contribute decisively to a multilayered reality that reaches half of the world's population. The analysis of this network of networks is carried out through rationality and responsibility. Thus, this paper analyzes its ethical responsibility based on the social ontology of business firms and the ethical problems according to the kind of rationality involved in the companies — micro, meso or macro — in accordance with their goals. Then, from the perspective of service to society, this study reflects on business ethics of the Internet — in the broad sense — in two directions: 1) the need for evaluative rationality or rationality of ends, because instrumental rationality or rationality of means is insufficient for ethics, and 2) the importance of combining individual responsibility with social responsibility.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ANSCOMBE, G. E. M. ([1957] 1963). Intention, Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1957; 2nd ed., 1963 (reprinted in 1976).
  • BERNERS-LEE, T., HALL, W., HENDLER, J., SHADBOT, N. and WEITZNER, D. J. (2006). “Creating a Science of the Web”, Science, 313 (5788): pp. 769-771.
  • CERF, V. G. (2014). “Knocking Down Strawmen”, IEEE Internet Computing, 18 (6): pp. 88-88.
  • CLARK, D. D. (2018). Designing an Internet, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • DASGUPTA, S. (2003). “Multidisciplinary creativity: The case of Herbert A. Simon,” Cognitive Science, 27 (5): pp. 683-707.
  • DOUGLASS, B. (1980). “The Common Good and the Public Interest,” Political Theory, 8 (1): pp. 103-117.
  • FLORIDI, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution - How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • GDPR (2016). “General Data Protection Regulation”, Official Journal of the European Union, v. 59, May 4th 2016, pp. 1-88. Available in https://gdpr-info.eu Accessed on 19.11.2019.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (1998). “Prediction and Prescription in Economics: A Philosophical and Methodological Approach,” Theoria, 13 (32): pp. 321-345.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2007a). “Análisis de las Ciencias de Diseño desde la racionalidad limitada, la predicción y la prescripción.” In: GONZALEZ, W. J. (ed.), Las Ciencias de Diseño: Racionalidad limitada, predicción y prescripción, A Coruña: Netbiblo, pp. 3-38.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2007b). “Configuración de las Ciencias de Diseño como Ciencias de lo Artificial: Papel de la Inteligencia Artificial y de la racionalidad limitada.” In: GONZALEZ, W. J. (ed.), Las Ciencias de Diseño: Racionalidad limitada, predicción y prescripción, A Coruña: Netbiblo, pp. 41-69.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2013a). “The Roles of Scientific Creativity and Technological Innovation in the Context of Complexity of Science.” In: GONZALEZ, W. J. (ed.), Creativity, Innovation, and Complexity in Science, A Coruña: Netbiblo, pp. 11-40.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2013b). “The Sciences of Design as Sciences of Complexity: The Dynamic Trait.” In: ANDERSEN, H., DIEKS, D., GONZALEZ, W. J., UEBEL, TH. and WHEELER, G. (eds.), New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 299-311.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2015a). Philosophico-Methodological Analysis of Prediction and its Role in Economics, Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2015b). “On the Role of Values in the Configuration of Technology: From Axiology to Ethics.” In: GONZALEZ, W. J. (ed.), New Perspectives on Technology, Values, and Ethics: Theoretical and Practical, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3-27.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2017). “From Intelligence to Rationality of Minds and Machines in Contemporary Society: The Sciences of Design and the Role of Information,” Minds and Machines, 27 (3): pp. 397-424. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-017-9439-0.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2018a). “Configuration of Causality and Philosophy of Psychology: An Analysis of Causality as Intervention and its Repercussion for Psychology.” In: GONZALEZ, W. J. (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology: Causality and Psychological Subject. New Reflections on James Woodward’s Contribution, Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 21-70.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2018b). “Complejidad dinámica en Internet como plataforma de información y comunicación: Análisis filosófico desde la perspectiva de Ciencias de Diseño y el papel de la predicción,” Informação e Sociedade: Estudos, 28 (1): pp. 155-168.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2018c). “Internet en su vertiente científica: Predicción y prescripción ante la complejidad,” Artefactos, 7(2), 2nd period: pp. 75-97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/art2018717597.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2020a). “La dimensión social de Internet: Análisis filosófico-metodológico desde la complejidad,” Artefactos: Revista de Estudios sobre Ciencia y Tecnología, 9 (1): pp. 101-129.
  • GONZALEZ, W. J. (2020b). “Electronic Economy, Internet and Business Legitimacy.” In: RENDTORFF, J. D. (ed.), Handbook of Business Legitimacy: Responsibility, Ethics and Society, Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_84-1
  • GREENSTEIN, S. (2015). How the Internet Became Commercial. Innovation, Privatization, and the Birth of a New Network, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • HALL, W., HENDLER, J., and STAAB, S. (2016). “A Manifesto for Web Science @10,” December, pp. 1-4. Available at: http://www.webscience.org/manifesto (Accessed on 16.5.2018).
  • HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW STAFF (2014). “With Big Data Comes Big Responsibility,” Harvard Business Review, November, pp. 101-104.
  • HAUSMAN, D., MCPHERSON, M. and SATZ, D. (2016). Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • HENDLER, J. and GOLBECK, J. (2008). “Metcalfe’s Law, Web 2.0, and the Semantic Web,” Journal Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 6 (1): pp. 14-20.
  • HENDLER, J. and HALL, W. (2016). “Science of the World Wide Web,” Science, 354 (6313): pp. 703-704.
  • HENDLER, J. (forthcoming). “The Future of the Web.” In: GONZALEZ, W. J. (ed.), The Internet and Science: An Analysis from the Structural and Dynamic Complexity.
  • HI-RETAIL (2020). “79 horas a la semana pegados a la pantalla: Así es el confinamiento de los españoles”, available at: https://hiretail.es/tendencias/tech/79-horas-a-la-semana-pegados-a-la-pantalla-asi-es-el-confinamiento-de-los-espanoles/ 3.4.2020. (Accessed on 7.4.2020).
  • HUME, D. ([1739-1740] 1964). A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • KHOSROWI, D. (2019). “Trade-Offs Between Epistemic and Moral Values in Evidence-Based Policy,” Economics and Philosophy, 35 (1): pp. 49-78.
  • KITCHER, P. (2010). “Varieties of Altruism,” Economics and Philosophy, 26 (2): pp. 121-148.
  • KLAES, M. and SENT, E.-M. (2005). “A Conceptual History of the Emergence of Bounded Rationality,” History of Political Economy, 37 (1): pp. 27-59.
  • LIAO, S. (2019). “Tim Cook says tech needs to be regulated or it could cause ‘great damage to society.’ ‘We are advocating strongly for regulation — I do not see another path,” The Verge, April 23rd 2019. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/23/18512838/tim-cook-tech-regulation-society-damage-apple-ceo (accessed on 27.5.2019).
  • MEEKER, M. (2019). Internet Trends 2019. Report published on 11 June 2019, 334 pages. Available in: https://www.bondcap.com/pdf/Internet_Trends_2019.pdf Accessed on 22 July 2019.
  • NIINILUOTO, I. (1993). “The Aim and Structure of Applied Research,” Erkenntnis, 38 (1): pp. 1-21.
  • RESCHER, N. (1987). Ethical Idealism: An Inquiry into the Nature and Function of Ideals, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • RESCHER, N. (1988). Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • RESCHER, N. (1999). Razón y valores en la Era científico-tecnológica, Barcelona: Paidós.
  • RESCHER, N. (2003). “Collective responsibility.” In: RESCHER, N., Sensible Decisions. Issues of Rational Decision in Personal Choice and Public Policy, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 125-138.
  • SCHEFCZYK, M. and PEACOCK, M. (2010). “Altruism as a Thick Concept,” Economics and Philosophy, 26 (2): pp. 165-187.
  • SCHULTZE, S. J. and WHITT, R. S. (2016). “Internet as a Complex Layered System.” In: BAUER, J. M. and LATZER, M. (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 55-71.
  • SELTEN, R. and OCKENFELS, A. (1998). “An Experimental Solidarity Game,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34 (4): pp. 517-539.
  • SHRADER-FRECHETTE, K. (2005). “Objectivity and Professional Duties Regarding Science and Technology.” In GONZALEZ, W. J. (ed.), Science, Technology and Society: A Philosophical Perspective, A Coruña: Netbiblo, pp. 51-79.
  • SIMM, K. (2011). “The Concepts of Common Good and the Public Interest: From Plato to Biobanking,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20 (4): pp. 554-562.
  • SIMON, H. A. (1957). Models of Man, N. York, NY: J. Wiley.
  • SIMON, H. A. (1976). "From Substantive to Procedural Rationality.” In: LATSIS, S. J. (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129-148.
  • SIMON, H. A. (1983). Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • SIMON, H. A. (1991a). “Organizations and Markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (2): pp. 25-44.
  • SIMON, H. A. (1991b). Models of my Life, Basic Books, N. York, NY, (Later reprinted in Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996).
  • SIMON, H. A. (1995). "Rationality in Political Behavior," Political Psychology, 16 (1): pp. 45-61.
  • SIMON, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed., Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (1st ed. in 1969, and 2nd ed. in 1981).
  • SIMON, H. A. (2005). “Darwinism, Altruism and Economics.” In: DOPFER, K. (ed.), The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89-104.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2018a). “Epic fall,” Section Leaders, March 24th 2018, p. 9.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2018b). “More knock-on than network. How the internet lost its decentralised innocence,” Special Report: Fixing the Internet, v. 427, n. 9098, June 30th 2018, pp. 5-6.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2018c). “The ultimate walled garden,” Special Report: Fixing the Internet, v. 427, n. 9098, June 30th 2018, pp. 9-10.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2018d). “The new Yahoo?” Section Business: Facebook’s future, November 24th 2018, pp. 58-59.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2018e). “Les estats, c’est moi. A new way to think about data is needed,” Section Leaders, December 22nd 2018, pp. 13-14.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019a). “The Cambridge Analytica bill,” Section Tech and Privacy, March 2nd 2019, pp. 41-42.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019b). “Facebook’s third act,” Section Business: Tech and Privacy, March 9 th 2019, p. 57.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019c). “Europe takes on the tech giants,” Section Leaders, March 23rd 2019, p. 11.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019d). “Careful what you wish for,” Section Business, April 6th , 2019, p. 55.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019e). “The learning machine,” Section Business: AI at Amazon, April 13th 2019, pp. 54-55.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019f). “Communication breakdown. How a giant Chinese telecoms firm became mired in political controversy,” Section Briefing Huawei, April 27th 2019, pp. 18-20.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019g). “Tech’s ride on the banks,” Section Leaders, May 4th 2019, p. 9.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019h). “Technology wars. Inglorious isolation”, Section Business, May 25th 2019, pp. 57-58.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2019i). “Ask and you shall receive. Why managers should listen to shareholders, Section Bartley, June 1st 2019, p. 53.
  • THE ECONOMIST (2020), “Telecommunications: 5Geopolitics,” Section Business, April 11th 2020, pp. 47-49.
  • TUOMELA, R. (1991). “The Social Dimension of Action Theory,” Daimon, 3: pp. 145-158.
  • TUOMELA, R. (1996). The Importance of Us, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • TUOMELA, R. (2007). The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View, N. York: Oxford University Press.
  • VON WRIGHT, G. H. (1983). Practical Reason, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • WORLD WIDE WEB FOUNDATION (2019). Contract for the Web. A Global Plan of Action to Make our Online World Safe and Empowering for Everyone, November 2019. Available at: https://contractfortheweb.org Accessed on 25.11.2019.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet