Sobre los bienes básicos de John Finnis como fundamento para los bioderechos

  1. María-Carolina Pereira-Sáez
Revista:
Persona y derecho: Revista de fundamentación de las Instituciones Jurídicas y de Derechos Humanos

ISSN: 0211-4526

Ano de publicación: 2020

Título do exemplar: Cuarenta años de la publicación de Natural Law and Natural Rights de John Finnis [II] (José Antonio Retamar, coord.)

Número: 83

Páxinas: 463-490

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.15581/011.83.005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Persona y derecho: Revista de fundamentación de las Instituciones Jurídicas y de Derechos Humanos

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

The purpose of this paper is to suggest that John Finnis’ basic goods may provide a reasonable basis for present-day bio-rights. To this end we start by recalling the present situation of human rights –which are not at their best, but rather in a situation of hyper-pluralistic fragmentation and proliferation– and their need for a foundation; in particular, for the so-called bio-rights. In the following, we will present the main aspects of John Finnis’ work regarding basic goods and their demands; especially their relationship with rights. To conclude, we will discuss if considering John Finnis’s basic goods as foundation for bio-rights would allow us to give a minimum of order and meaning in the mentioned landscape of proliferation and hyper-pluralism.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alexy, R., «Law, Morality and the Existence of Human Rights», Ratio Iuris, vol. 25, n. 1, 2012, pp. 2-14.
  • Bauman, Z., Miedo líquido: la sociedad contemporánea y sus temores (trad. de A. Santos), Paidós, Barcelona, 2010.
  • Bauman, Z. y Donskis, L., Ceguera moral: la pérdida de sensibilidad en la modernidad líquida (trad. de A. F. Rodríguez), Paidós, Barcelona, 2015.
  • Bradley, A. y Ewing, K., Constitutional and Administrative Law, 16.ª ed. Pearson, Harlow, 2015.
  • Carozza, P., «Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights: A Reply», The European Journal of international Law, vol. 19, 2008, pp. 931-944.
  • Chomsky, N., The Essential Chomsky, The New Press, Nueva York, 2008.
  • Christie, G., «Judicial Decision Making in a World of Natural Law and Natural Rights», Vilanova Law Review, vol. 57, 2012, pp. 811-822.
  • Donnelly, J., «The Relative Universality of Human Rights», en Human Rights Quartely, vol. 29, n. 2, 2007, pp. 218-306.
  • Donnelly, J., Universal Human Rights in Theory and in Practice, 3.ª ed., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2013.
  • Finnis, J., Fundamentals of Ethics, Georgetown University Press, Washington, 1983.
  • — «Problems of the philosophy of law», Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995, pp. 468-472.
  • — «Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?», George, R. P. (ed.), Natural Law, Liberalism and Morality, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996, pp. 1-26.
  • — Aquinas, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
  • — «Natural Law: The Classical Tradition», en Coleman, J. y Shapiro, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002, pp. 1-60.
  • — «The Priority of Persons», en Intention and Identity. Collected Essays II, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, pp. 19-35.
  • — «Introduction», en Human Rights and Common Good. Collected Essays III, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, pp. 1-16.
  • — Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2.ª ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • — «Discourse, Truth and Friendship», en Reason in Action. Collected Essays I, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, pp. 41-61.
  • — «Human Rights and their Enforcement», en Human Rights and Common Good. Collected Essays III. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, pp. 19-46.
  • — «The Priority of Persons Revisited», American Journal of Jurisprudence vol. 58, n. 1, 2013, pp. 45-62.
  • — «A response to Harel, Hope, and Schwartz», Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, vol. 8, n. 1, 2013, pp. 1-20.
  • — «Grounding Human Rights in Natural Law», The American Journal of Jurisprudence, vol. 60, n. 2, 2015, pp. 199-225.
  • — «On Moyn’s Christian Human Righs (2015)», King’s Law Journal, vol. 28, n. 1, 2017, pp. 12-20.
  • — Judicial Power and the Balance of Our Constitution, Policy Exchange, Londres, 2018.
  • — «Unborn Human Life and Fundamental Rights: Concluding Reflections», Zambrano, P y Saunders, W. L. (eds.), Unborn Life and Fundamental Rights. Leading Constitutional cases Under Scrutiny, Peter Lang, Berlin, 2019, pp. 255.264.
  • Fuller, L. L., The Morality of Law, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1969.
  • Gregory, B., The Unintended Reformation. How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 2012.
  • Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action II, Beacon Press, Boston, 1987.
  • Habermas, J., El futuro de la naturaleza humana. ¿Hacia una eugenesia liberal? (trad. de R. S. Carbó), Paidós, Barcelona, 2002.
  • Habermas, J., «The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights», Metaphilosophy, vol. 41, n. 4, 2010, pp. 464-480.
  • HAN, B.C., The Transparency Society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2015.
  • HAN, B.C., The Topology of Violence, The Mit Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 2018.
  • Kaufmann, A., La filosofía del derecho en la postmodernidad (trad. de L. Villar Bordá), 2.ª ed., Temis, Santa Fe de Bogotá, 1998.
  • Marshall, G., «1984: A Happy New Year for Civil Liberties», Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 37, 1984, pp. 1-32.
  • Massini, C.I., «Sobre bienes humanos, naturaleza humana y ley natural. Reflexiones a partir de las ideas de Javier Hervada y John Finnis», Persona y Derecho, vol. 71, n. 2, 2014, pp. 229-256.
  • Matláry, J.H., When Might Becomes Human Right. Essays on Democracy and the Crisis of Rationality, Gracewing, Leominster, 2007.
  • Mignolo, W., «From ‘human rights’ to ‘life rights’», Douzinas, C. y Gearty, C. (eds). The Meanings of Rights. The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. 161-180.
  • Mouffe, C., «Democracy, human rights and cosmopolitanism: an agonistic approach», Douzinas, C. y Gearty, C. (eds). The Meanings of Rights. The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. 181-211.
  • Negro, D., El mito del hombre nuevo, Encuentro, Madrid, 2009.
  • D’Ors, A., «Autoridad y potestad», Escritos varios sobre el Derecho en crisis, CSIC, Roma- Madrid, 1973, pp. 93-105.
  • Pereira Menaut, A. C., Lecciones de teoría constitucional y otros escritos, Andavira, Santiago de Compostela, 2016.
  • Pereira Sáez, C., La autoridad del derecho. Un diálogo con John M. Finnis, Comares, Granada, 2008.
  • Perry, M., The Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
  • Porter, J., «From Natural Law to human Rights: Or, Why Rights Talk Matters», Journal of Law and Religion vol. XIV, n. 1, 1999, pp. 77-96.
  • Possenti, V., La revoluzione biopolitica, Lindau, Torino, 2013.
  • Raz, J., «Human Rights Without Foundations», University of Oxford Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Working Paper, vol. 14, 2007, pp. 1-20.
  • Rawls, J., The Law of the Peoples, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1999.
  • Santos, J.A., «Tiempo histórico, naturaleza humana y perfeccionismo», Santos, J. A., Albert, M. y Hermida, C. (eds.), Bioética y nuevos derechos, Comares, Granada, 2016, pp.17-27.
  • Shortall, M., Human Rights and Moral Reasoning, Gregorian and Biblical Press, Roma, 2009.
  • Sangiuliano, A., «Towards a Natural Law Foundationalist Theory of Universal Human Rights», Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper, 111, 2015, pp. 218-240.
  • Tasioulas, J., «Towards a Philosophy of Human Rights» Current Legal Problems, vol. 65, 2012, pp. 1-30.
  • Taylor, C., Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York, 1989.
  • Viola, F., De la naturaleza a los derechos. Los lugares de la ética contemporánea (trad. de V. Bellver), Comares, Granada, 1998.
  • Zagrebelsky, G., El Derecho dúctil (trad. de M. Gascón), Trotta, Madrid, 1995.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet