La liturgia como programaPrimera mesa redonda

  1. Fernández-Cobián, Esteban
  2. Vicéns Hualde, Ignacio
  3. Della Longa, Giorgio 1
  4. Zahner, Walter 2
  1. 1 Roma Tre University
    info

    Roma Tre University

    Roma, Italia

    ROR https://ror.org/05vf0dg29

  2. 2 Sociedad Alemana de Arte Cristiano de Munich
Journal:
Actas de Arquitectura Religiosa Contemporánea

ISSN: 2659-8671 2340-5503

Year of publication: 2007

Issue Title: Arquitecturas de lo sagrado. Memoria y proyecto

Issue: 1

Pages: 92-105

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17979/AARC.2007.1.0.5019 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Actas de Arquitectura Religiosa Contemporánea

Abstract

I think it is very positive that controversial issues have been generated, questions, concerns. Of course, my intervention had no other purpose than to fully open up the range of problems that are currently being worked on, in line with the issues that have been dealt with throughout the 20th century and also based on definitions I tried to make them very precise - of what is meant by sacredness, by liturgy and by church. From there, the possibility of dialogue and discussions remains open. I have said in my speech that both architects and current liturgists - I do not remember if I said it that way, so clear -, each one in his field is the son of a revolution, that is, of a movement that has made a request for a principle about a certain discipline and arrogates to himself the absolute truth. It is very difficult that intellectual positions like these come to be understood. That is why dialogue between modern architects and modern liturgists is so difficult.