Análisis de redes complejas del transporte marítimo en el Océano Atlántico

  1. González Laxe, Fernando 1
  2. Freire Seoane, María Jesús 1
  3. Pais Montes, Carlos 1
  4. López Bermúdez, Beatriz 1
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

Revista:
Revista de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 1315-9518

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 25

Número: 1

Páginas: 42-61

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.31876/RCS.V25I1.29596 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de ciencias sociales

Resumen

La globalización ha generado cambios importantes en los esquemas del transporte marítimo internacional. Por lo cual, con el objetivo de constatar las evidencias sobre los cambios de la estructura de conectividad del sistema portuario en el Océano Atlántico, durante el periodo de 2006 a 2011, en este artículo se utiliza una metodología de análisis de redes complejas. La hipótesis a contrastar es si ha existido un cambio significativo en el desplazamiento de la demanda de servicios marítimo, y por tanto, un desplazamiento de los flujos comerciales internacionales hacia las regiones situadas en el Atlántico Sur (costas de Brasil-Uruguay-Argentina y Golfo de Guinea) en este periodo. En base a la topología de red obtenida, todo parece indicar que a lo largo del período analizado, e inmediatamente posterior al inicio de la Gran Recesión, el transporte contenerizado atlántico influyente, ha basculado hacia las economías de la Costa Oeste de África de la Costa Este de Suramérica, manteniendo estos países una mayor resiliencia ante la crisis, que las economías de la ribera norte del Océano Atlántico. En conclusión, se pueden detectar importantes cambios en la estructura del tráfico transatlántico de carga marítima, y por tanto, del comercio internacional de mercancías.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ashar, A. (2012). The fourth revolution: Long-term developments of containerized shipping. Port Technology, 55(1), 77-83.
  • Ashar, A. (2015). The impact of Panama canal on trade and transhipment. En TOC Conference Americas 2015. Conferencia llevada a cabo en el Congreso TOC 2015, Ciudad de Panama.
  • Barabási, A. L., y, Réka, A. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509-512.
  • Bastian, M., Heymann, S., y Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 8, 361-362.
  • Bierbrauer, E. (2015). The transatlantic trade and investment partnership: The sluggish state of negotiations. Bruselas: Parlamento Europeo. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/1S99TFp
  • Blonigen, B. A., y Wesley, W. (2008). Port efficiency and trade flows. Review of International Economics, 16(1), 21-36.
  • Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., y Hwang, D-U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics reports, 424(4-5), 175-308.
  • Boney, J. (2016). Analysts anticipate ‘gradual’ impact from expanded Panama locks. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/2p5b9C2
  • Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2), 163-177.
  • Cabral, A., y Ramos, F. (2014). Cluster analysis of the competitiveness of container ports in Brazil. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69(C), 423-431.
  • Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., y Ronen, D. (2004). Ship routing and scheduling: Status and perspectives. Transportation Science, 38(1), 1-18.
  • Clark, X., Dollar, D., y Micco, A. (2002). Maritime transport costs and port efficiency. Policy Research Working paper, (2781). The World Bank. Recuperado de http://documentos.bancomundial.org/curated/es/451431468766755364/pdf/multi0page.pdf
  • Containerisation International - CI (2009ad). It’s time for the hysteria to stop. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2009be). Stop Start. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2010a). An expanding brief. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2010b). Shipper’s survey’10. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2011a). Boom time in Brazil. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2011b). Opening up. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2012). Santos: It’s all change. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2013a). A wider appeal. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2013b). The battle of Hampton Roads. Londres, UK.
  • Containerisation International - CI (2013c). The boy’s from Brazil. Londres, UK.
  • Costenbader, E., y Valente, T. W. (2003). The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Social Networks, 25(4), 283-307.
  • Cullinane, K., Wang, T. F., Song, D. W., y Ping, Ji. (2006). The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(4), 354-374.
  • Ducruet, C., y Faraz, Z. (2012). Maritime constellations: A complex network approach to shipping and ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(2), 151-168.
  • Ducruet, C., y Notteboom, T. (2012). The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: Spatial structure and regional dynamics. Global Networks, 12(3), 395-423.
  • Ducruet, C., Lee, S-W., y Ng, A. K. Y. (2010a). Centrality and vulnerability in liner shipping networks: Revisiting the Northeast Asian port hierarchy. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(1), 17-36.
  • Ducruet, C., Rozenblat, C., y Faraz, Z. (2010b). Ports in multi-level maritime networks: evidence from the Atlantic (1996–2006). Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4), 508-518.
  • Dwyer, T., Koren, Y., y Marriott, K. (2006). IPSep-CoLa: An incremental procedure for separation constraint layout of graphs. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 12(5), 821-828.
  • Eades, P., y Huang, M. L. (2000). Navigating clustered graphs using force-directed methods. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 4(3), 157-181.
  • European Commission - EC (2014). De politieke vooruitzichten voor de TTIP. Recuperado de https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-662_en.htm
  • European Commission - EC (2015). TTIP transparency: Commision publishes detailed report on 11th round of talks. Recuperado de http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1391
  • Freire-Seoane, M. J., Gonzalez-Laxe, F., y Pais-Montes, C. (2013). Foreland determination for containership and general cargo ports in Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 30(1), 56-67.
  • Fremont, A. (2007). Global maritime networks: The case of Maersk. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(6), 431-442.
  • Gelareh, S., Nickel, S., y Pisinger, D. (2010). Liner shipping hub network design in a competitive environment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(6), 991-1004.
  • Gonzalez-Laxe, F. Freire-Seoane, M. J., y Pais-Montes, C. (2012). Maritime degree, centrality and vulnerability: port hierarchies and emerging areas in containerized transport (2008-2010). Journal of Transport Geography, 24(1), 33-44.
  • Harati-Mokhtari, A., Wall, A., Brooks, P., y Wang, J. (2007). Automatic Identification System (AIS): data reliability and human error implications. Journal of Navigation, 60(3), 373-389.
  • Hartnell, N. (2014). Port’s 25% growth hides missed trade potential. The Tribune. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/2Fw9sEX
  • Hayut, Y. (1981). Containerization and the load center concept. Economic Geography, 57(2), 160-176.
  • Hesse, M., y Rodrigue, J-P. (2004). The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(3), 171-184.
  • Holten, D., y Van Wijk, J. J. (2009). Force-Directed edge bundling for graph visualization. Computer Graphics Forum, 28(3), 983-990.
  • Hu, Y. (2005). Efficient, high-quality force-directed graph drawing Mathematica Journal, 10(1), 37-71.
  • International Maritime Organization - IMO (2001). Sistema de asignación de un número de la OMI a los buques para su identificación. Recuperado de http://www.imo.org/es/OurWork/MSAS/Paginas/IMO-identification-number-scheme.aspx
  • Kaluza, P., Kölzsch, A., Gastner, M. T., y Blasius, B. (2010). The complex network of global cargo ship movements. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7(48), 1093-1103.
  • Kim, Y-S., Lee, H. G., y Shin, C-H. (2004). An empirical study on port selection criteria. Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, 28(6), 525-530.
  • Lake, P., y Crowther, P. (2013). Concise guide to databases: A practical introduction (Undergraduate topics in computer science). Londres: Springer-Verlag.
  • Lambert, A., y Auber, D. (2012). Graph analysis and visualization with Tulip-Python. Conferencia llevada a cabo en EuroSciPy 2012-5th European meeting on Python in Science, Bruselas.
  • Li, Z., Xu, M., y Shi, Y. (2014). Centrality in global shipping network basing on worldwide shipping areas. GeoJournal, 80(1), 47-60.
  • Malchow, M., y Kanafani, A. (2001). A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection. Maritime Policy and Management, 28(3), 265-277.
  • Mañe, D. O. (2005). Emergence of the Gulf of Guinea in the global economy: Prospects and challenges. International Monetary Fund. Working paper (5-235). Recuperado de http://bit.ly/2FC3CoO
  • McCalla, R. (1999). Global change, local pain: Intermodal seaport terminals and their service areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 7(4), 247-254.
  • Meepetchdee, Y., y Shah, N. (2007). Logistical network design with robustness and complexity considerations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(3), 201-222.
  • Mesa-Arango, R., Narayanan, B. N., y Satish, V. U. (2019). The impact of international crises on maritime Transportation-Based Global Value Chains. Networks and Spatial Economics, 19(2), 381-408.
  • Ng, A. K. Y. (2006). Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: An agenda for future research in port competition. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(3), 234-241.
  • Notteboom, T. (2004). Container shipping and ports: An overview. Review of network economics, 3(2), 86-106.
  • Odeck, J., y Bråthen, S. (2012). A meta-analysis of DEA and SFA studies of the technical efficiency of seaports: A comparison of fixed and random-effects regression models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(10), 1574-1585.
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico - OECD (2008). The Impacts of Globalisation on International Maritime Transport Activity. Conferencia llevada a cabo en Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World. Guadalajara, Mexico.
  • Pais-Montes, C., Freire-Seoane, M. J., y Gonzalez-Laxe, F. (2012). General cargo and containership emergent routes: A complex networks description. Transport Policy, 24(1), 126-140.
  • Rodrigue, J. P., y Notteboom, T. (2010). Foreland-based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands. Research in Transportation Economics, 27(1), 19-29.
  • Rodrigue, J. P., Comtois, C., y Slack, B. (2013). The geography of transport systems. London: Routledge.
  • Slack, B. (2001). Global reach: The evolving pattern of container shipping networks. Universite of Montreal, Montreal.
  • Song, D-W., y Panayides, P. (2008). Global supply chain and port/terminal: Integration and competitiveness. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(1), 73-87.
  • Starr, J. T. (1994). The mid-Atlantic load centre: Baltimore or Hampton Roads? Maritime Policy and Management, 21(3), 219-227.
  • Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics. 3e. London: Routledge.
  • United Nations Conference on Trade And Development - UNCTAD (2013). Review of Maritime Transport 2013. Recuperado de https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2013_en.pdf
  • United Nations Conference on Trade And Development - UNCTAD (2014). Review of Maritime Transport 2014. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/1p27Us8
  • United Nations Conference on Trade And Development - UNCTAD (2015). Review of Maritime Transport 2015. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/1YwtssP
  • United Nations Conference on Trade And Development - UNCTAD (2016). UNCTADstat. Recuperado de http://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/
  • Vanegas, M., y Pascal, J. (2014). Equilibrio de Nash y resolución de conflictos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (RCS), XX(4), 658-677.
  • Wilmsmeier, G., Hoffmann, J., y Sanchez, R. (2006). The impact of port characteristics on international maritime transport costs. Research in Transportation Economics, 16(1), 117-140.
  • Woolley-Meza, O., Thiemann, C., Grady, D., Lee, J. J., Seebens, H., Blasius, B., y Dirk B. (2011). Complexity in human transportation networks: A comparative analysis of worldwide air transportation and global cargo-ship movements. The European Physical Journal B, 84(4), 589-600.
  • World Maritime News (2015). ECSA: TTIP must lift US restrictions on EU operators. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/2FtExZR
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet