Modelos de dinámicas de la opinión. Una revisión de la literatura

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abelson, R. P. 1964. “Mathematical Models of the Distribution of Attitudes Under Controversy”. Pp. 142-160 en Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, editado por N. Frederiksen y H. Gulliksen. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
• Acemo?lu, D., G. Como, F. Fagnani y A. Ozdaglar. 2013. “Opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks”, Mathematics of Operations Research 38(1): 127.
• Altafini, C. 2013. “Consensus problems on networks with antagonistic interactions”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 58(4): 935-946.
• Axelrod, R. 1997. “The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization”, Journal of conflict resolution 41(2): 203-226
• Baker, G. A. y J. P. Hague. 2008. “Rise of the centrist: from binary to continuous opinion dynamics”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 19(09): 1459-1475.
• Baldassarri, D. y P. Bearman. 2007. “Dynamics of political polarization”, American Sociological Review 72(5): 784- 811. h
• Balenzuela P., J.P. Pinasco y V. Semeshenko. 2015. “The Undecided Have the Key: Interaction-Driven Opinion Dynamics in a Three State Model”, PLoS ONE 10(10): e0139572.
• Bartolozzi, M., D. B. Leinweber y A. W. Thomas. 2005. “Stochastic opinion formation in scale-free networks”, Physical Review E 72: 046113 https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevE.72.046113
• Barth, V. 2006. “A model of opinion dynamics among firms”, en Potentials of Complexity Science for Business, Government, and the Media, editado por D. Helbing. Budapest: Collegium Budapest.
• Battiston, F., A. Cairoli, V. Nicosia, A. Baule y V. Latora. 2016. “Interplay between consensus and coherence in a model of interacting opinions”, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 323: 12-19.
• Behera, L. y F. Schweitzer. 2003. “On Spatial Consensus Formation: Is the Sznajd Model Different from a Voter Model?”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 14(10): 1331-1354.
• Bernardes, A.T., U.M.S. Costa, A.D. Araujo y D. Stauffer. 2001. Damage spreading, coarsening dynamics and distribution of political votes in Sznajd model on square lattice. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 12(02), pp.159-167.
• Bernardes, A.T., D. Stauffer y J. Kertész. 2002. Election results and the Sznajd model on Barabasi network. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 25(1), pp.123-127.
• Bernheim, B.D. 1994. “A Theory of Conformity”, Journal of Political Economy 102(5): 841-877.
• Berger, R.L. 1981. “A necessary and sufficient condition for reaching a consensus using DeGroot’s method”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 76(374): 415- 418.
• Buechel, B., T. Hellmann y S. Klößner. 2015. “Opinion dynamics and wisdom under conformity”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 52: 240-257.
• Cao, Z., M. Yang, X. Qu y X. Yang. 2012. “Rebels lead to the doctrine of the mean: opinion dynamic in a heterogeneous DeGroot model”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.0161. https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0161
• Castellano, C., S. Fortunato y V. Loreto. 2009. “Statistical physics of social dynamics”, Reviews of modern physics, 81(2): 591-646.
• Chacoma, A. y D. H. Zanette. 2015. “Opinion Formation by Social Influence: From Experiments to Modeling”, PLoS ONE 10(10): e0140406.
• Clifford, P. y A. Sudbury. 1973. “A model for spatial conflict”, Biometrika 60(3): 581588.
• Crokidakis, N. y P. M. C. De Oliveira. 2011. “The Sznajd model with limited persuasion: competition between high-reputation and hesitant agents”, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2011(11): P11004.
• Dall’Asta, L. y C. Castellano. 2007. “Effective surface-tension in the noise-reduced voter model”, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 77(6): 60005.
• Dandekar, P., A. Goel y D. T. Lee. 2013. “Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(15): 5791-5796.
• Daniel, G., M. Arce y T. Sandler. 2003. “An evolutionary game approach to fundamentalism and conflict”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE 159(1): 132-154.
• Deffuant, G., D. Neau, F. Amblard y G. Weisbuch. 2000. “Mixing beliefs among interacting agents”, Advances in Complex Systems 3(01n04): 87-98.
• Duggins, P. 2017. “A psychologically-motivated model of opinion change with applications to American politics”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 20(1): 13.
• Eger, S. 2013. “Opinion dynamics under opposition”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.3134.
• Elgazzar, A. S. 2003. “Applications of small-world networks to some socio-economic systems”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 324(1-2): 402407.
• Elster, J. 2007. Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Flache, A. y M. Mäs. 2008. “How to get the timing right. A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams”, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 14(1): 23-51.
• Flache, A., M. Mäs, T. Feliciani, E. Chattoe-Brown, G. Deffuant, S. Huet y J. Lorenz. 2017. “Models of Social Influence: Towards the Next Frontiers”, Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, 20(4).
• Fortunato, S. 2004. “Universality of the threshold for complete consensus for the opinion dynamics of Defuant et al”, International Journal of Modern Physic C 15(09): 1301- 1307.
• Fortunato, S. 2005. “The Sznajd consensus model with continuous opinions”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 16(01): 17-24.
• Fortunato, S., V. Latora, A. Pluchino y A. Rapisarda. 2005. “Vector opinion dynamics in a bounded confidence consensus model”, Interational Journal of Modern Physics C 16(10): 1535-1551.
• Fortunato, S. y D. Stauffer. 2006. “Computer simulations of opinions and their reactions to extreme events”. Pp. 233-257 en Extreme events in nature and society, editado por Sergio Albeverio, S., Jentsch, V. y H. Kantz. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
• French, J. R. P. Jr. 1956. “A formal theory of social power”, Psychological Review 63(3): 181-194.
• Friedkin, N.E. 2015. “The problem of social control and coordination of complex systems in sociology: A look at the community cleavage problem”, IEEE Control Systems 35(3): 40-51.
• Galam, S. 2002. “Minority opinion spreading in random geometry”, The European Physical Journal B, 25(4):403- 406.
• Galam, S. 2004. “Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: ‘the hung elections scenario’”. Physica A 333: 453-460.
• Galam, S. 2008. “Sociophysics: A review of Galam models”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 19(03): 409- 440.
• Galam, S., Y. Gefen, e Y. Shapir. 1982. “Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. I. meanbehaviour description of a strike”, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 9(1): 1-13.
• Galam, S. y S. Moscovici. 1991. “Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups”, European Journal of Social Psychology 21(1): 49-74.
• Galam, S. y M. A. Javarone. 2016. “Modeling radicalization phenomena in heterogeneous populations”, PLoS ONE 11(5): e0155407.
• García-Valdecasas, J. I. 2013. “Grupos moderados y tolerantes en la polarización política de las redes sociales”, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 142(1): 25-44.
• Gargiulo, F. e Y. Gandica. 2017. “The role of homophily in the emergence of opinion controversies”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 20(3):8.
• Gekle, S., L. Peliti y S. Galam. 2005. “Opinion dynamics in a three-choice system”, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems B 45: 569-575.
• Gil, S. y D. H. Zanette. 2006. “Coevolution of agents and networks: Opinion spreading and community disconnection”, Physics Letters A 356(2): 89-94.
• Gilbert, N. Troitzsch, K. 2005. Simulation for the social scientist. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Ginkel, J. y A. Smith. 1999. “So you say you want a revolution: A game theoretic explanation of revolution in repressive regimes”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 43(3): 291- 316.
• González-Avella, J. C., Eguíluz, V. M., Cosenza, M. G., Klemm, K., J. Herrera y M. San Miguel. 2006. “Local versus global interactions in nonequilibrium transitions: A model of social dynamics”, Physical Review E 73(4): 046119.
• González-Avella, J. C., Cosenza, M. G., Klemm, K., V.M. Eguíluz y M. San Miguel. 2007. “Information feedback and mass media effects in cultural dynamics”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10(39)1
• .
• González-Avella, J. C., M.G. Cosenza y M. San Miguel. 2012. “A model for cross-cultural reciprocal interactions through mass media”, PloSone 7(12): e51035.
• Grabowsky, A. y R. A. Kosinsky. 2006. “Ising-based model of opinion formation in a complex network of interpersonal interactions”, Physica A 361: 651-664.
• Groot, M.H. de 1974. “Reaching consensus”, Journal of American Statistical Association 69: 118-121.
• Halu, A., K. Zhao, A. Baronchelli y G. Bianconi. 2013. “Connect and win: The role of social networks in political elections”, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 102(1): 16002.
• Hedström, P. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hedström, P. 2006. “Explaining social change: An analytical approach”, Papers. Revista de Sociologia 80: 73-95.
• Hedström, P. y P. Bearman (eds.). 2009. The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hedström, P. y G. Manzo, (eds.) 2015. “Special Issue: Agent- Based Modeling: Advances and Challenges”, Sociological Methods & Research 44(2).
• Hegselmann, R. y U. Krause. 2002. “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence. Models, analysis and simulation”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3):2.
• Holley, R. y T. M. Liggett. 1975. “Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting systems and the voter model”, The annals of probability 3(4): 643-663.
• Ho?yst, J. A., K. Kacperski y F. Schweitzer. 2001. “Social impact models of opinion dynamics”, Annual Reviews Of Computational Physics IX: 253-273.
• Imhoff, R. y H. P. Erb. 2009. “What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35(3): 309- 320.
• Jager, W. y F. Amblard. 2005. “Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behaviour with an agent-based simulation model of attitude change”, Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 10(4): 295303.
• Jarman, M., A. Nowak, W. Borkowski, D. Serfass, A. Wong y R. Vallacher. 2015. “The critical few: Anticonformists at the crossroads of minority opinion survival and collapse”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(1)6.
• Javarone, M. A. 2014. “Social influences in opinion dynamics: the role of conformity”, Physica A 414: 19-30.
• Javarone M. A. y T. Squartini. 2015. “Conformism-driven phases of opinion formation on heterogeneous networks: the q-voter model case”, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment P10002.
• Jiang, L. L., D.Y. Hua y T. Chen. (2007). “Nonequilibrium phase transitions in a model with social influence of inflexible units”. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40: 11271-11276.
• Jiang, L. L., D.Y. Hua, J.F. Zhu, B.H. Wang y T. Zhou. 2008. “Opinion dynamics on directed small-world networks”, The European Physical Journal B 65(2), 251255.
• Klick, J. y F. Parisi. 2008. “Social networks, self-denial, and median preferences”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37: 13191327.
• Kou, G., Y. Zhao, Y. Peng e Y. Shi. 2012. “Multi-level opinion dynamics under bonded confidence”, PlosOne, 7(9): e43507.
• Krause, U. 2000. “A discrete nonlinear and non-autonomous model of consensus formation”. Pp. 227-236 en Communications in Difference Equations, editado por Elyadi, S., Ladas, G., Popenda, J. y J. Rakowski, Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Pub.
• Kurahashi-Nakamura, T., M. Mäs y J. Lorenz. 2016. “Robust clustering in generalized bounded confidence models”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 19(4)7.
• Kuran, T. 1987a. “Chameleon voters and public choice”, Public Choice 53(1): 53-78.
• Kuran, T. 1987b. “Preference falsification, policy continuity and collective conservatism”, The Economic Journal, 97(387): 642-665.
• Kuran, T. 1988. “The tenacious past: Theories of personal and collective conservatism”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 10(2): 143-171.
• Kuran, T. 1989. “Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution”, Public Choice 61(1): 41-74.
• Kuran, T. 1990. “Private and public preferences”, Economics and Philosophy 6: 1-26.
• Kuran, T. 1991a. “Cognitive limitations and preference evolution”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 147: 241-273. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40751404
• Kuran, T. 1991b. “Now out of never: The element of surprise in the East European revolution of 1989”, World politics 44(01): 748.
• Kuran, T. 1993. “The Unthinkable and the Unthought”, Rationality and Society 5(4): 473-505.
• Kuran, T. 1995. Private truths, public lies: the social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
• Kuran, T. 2001. “Public opinion, microsociological aspects”. Pp. 12556-12560 en International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
• Kurmyshev, E., y H. A. Juárez. 2013. “What is a leader of opinion formation in bounded confidence models?”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.4677. https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4677 1-18.
• Kurmyshev, E., H.A. Juárez y R.A. González-Silva. 2011. Dynamics of bounded confidence opinion in heterogeneous social networks: Concord against partial antagonism. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390(16), pp.2945-2955.
• Laguna, M. F., S.R. Gusman, G. Abramson, S. Gonçalves y J. R. Iglesias. 2005. “The dynamics of opinion in hierarchical organizations”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 351(2-4): 580-592.
• Lallouache, M., A. Chakraborti y B. K. Chakrabarti. 2010a. “Kinetic exchange models for social opinion formation”, Science and Culture 76(9-10): 485-488.
• Lallouache, M., A.S. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti y B.K. Chakrabarti. 2010b. Opinion formation in kinetic exchange models: Spontaneous symmetry-breaking transition. Physical Review E, 82(5), p.056-112.
• Lasswell, H. 1927. Propaganda techniques in the World War. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Latané, B. 1981. “The psychology of social impact”, American Psychologist 36(4): 343356.
• Leonardelli, G. J., C.L. Pickett y M. B. Brewer. 2010. “Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 43: 63113.
• Linares, F. 2018. Sociología y teoría social analíticas. Madrid: Alianza editorial.
• Lohmann, S. 1994. “The dynamics of informational cascades”, World Politics 47: 42101.
• Lorenz, J. 2006. “Consensus strikes back in the Hegselmann- Krause model of continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9:8.
• Lorenz, J. 2007. “Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: a survey”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 18(12): 1819-1838.
• Lorenz, J. 2010. “Heterogeneous bounds of confidence: Meet, discuss and find consensus!”, Complexity 15(4): 43- 52.
• Lorenz, J., H. Rauhut, F. Schweitzer y D. Helbing. 2011. “How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 90209025.
• Macy, M. W., J.A. Kitts, A. Flache y S. Benard. 2003. “Polarization in dynamic networks: A hopfield model of emergent structure”. Pp. 162173 en Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis. Washington D. C.: National Academies Press.
• Makowsky, M. D. y J. Rubin. 2013. “An agent-based model of centralized institutions, social network technology, and revolution”, PLoS ONE 8(11): e80380.
• Mark, N.P. 2003. “Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches”, American Sociological Review 68(3): 319-345.
• Marsden, P. V. 1981. “Introducing influence processes into a system of collective decision”, American Journal of Sociology 86: 1203-35.
• Martins, A. C. 2008. “Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinions dynamics problems”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 19(4): 617-624.
• Mäs, M., A. Flache y J. A. Kitts. 2014. “Cultural integration and differentiation in groups and organizations”. Pp. 71-90 en Perspectives on Culture and Agent-Based Simulations. Nueva York: Springer.
• Mäs, M., A. Flache y D. Helbing. 2010. “Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans”, PLoS Computational Biology. 6(10): e1000959.
• Mäs, M. y A. Flache. 2013. “Diferentiation without distancing. explaining bipolarization of opinions without negative influence”, PLoS ONE, 8(11): e74516.
• Mäs, M., A. Flache, K. Takacs y K. A. Jehn. 2013. “In the short term we divide, in the long term we unite: Demographic crisscrossing and the effects of fault lines on subgroup polarization”, Organization science 24(3): 716-736.
• Maslach, C., J. Stapp y R. T. Santee. 1985. “Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(3): 729-738.
• Mavrodiev, P., C.J. Tessone y F. Schweitzer. 2013. “Quantifying the effects of social influence”, Scientific Reports 3: 1360.
• Mirtabatabaei, A. y F. Bullo. 2012. “Opinion dynamics in heterogeneous networks: convergence conjectures and theorems”, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 50(5): 2763-2785.
• Mobilia, M., 2011. Fixation and polarization in a three-species opinion dynamics model. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 95(5), p.50002.
• Mobilia, M., A. Petersen y S. Redner. 2007. “On the role of zealotry in the voter model”, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007(08): P08029.
• Moussaïd, M., J.E. Kämmer, P.P. Analytis y H. Neth. 2013. “Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation”, Plos One 8(11): e78433.
• Nail, P. R., G. MacDonald y D. A. Levy. 2000. “Proposal of a four-dimensional model of social response”, Psychological Bulletin 126(3): 454-470.
• Nowak, A. y M. Lewenstein. 1996. “Modeling Social Change with Cellular Automata”. Pp. 249-285 en Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences From A Philosophy of Science Point of View editado por Hegselmann, R., Mueller, U. y K. G. Troitzsch. Dordrecht: Kluver.
• Nowak, A., J. Szamrej y B. Latané. 1990. “From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact”, Psychological Review 97(3), 362-376.
• Nyczka, P., K. Sznajd-Weron y J. Cis?o. 2012. “Phase transitions in the q-voter model with two types of stochastic driving”, Physical Review E 86(1): 011105.
• Regnault, D., N. Schabanel y É. Thierry. 2009. “Progresses in the analysis of stochastic 2D cellular automata: A study of asynchronous 2D minority”, Theoretical Computer Science 410(47-49): 4844-4855.
• Rubin, J. 2014. “Centralized institutions and cascades”, Journal of Comparative Economics 42(2): 340-357.
• Sabatelli, L. y P. Richmond. 2003. “Phase transitions, memory and frustration in a Sznajd-like model with synchronous updating”, International Journal of Modern Physics C, 14(09), 1223-1229.
• Sabatelli, L. y P. Richmond. 2004. “Non-monotonic spontaneous magnetization in a Sznajd-like consensus model”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 334(1-2): 274-280.
• Salzarulo, L. 2006. “A continuous opinion dynamics model based on the principle of meta-contrast”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(1).
• Schulze, C. 2004. “Sznajd opinion dynamics with global and local neighborhood”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 15(06): 867-872.
• Sen, P. 2011. “Phase transitions in a two-parameter model of opinion dynamics with random kinetic exchanges”, Physical Review E 83(1): 016108.
• Sen, P. 2012. “Nonconservative kinetic exchange model of opinion dynamics with randomness and bounded confidence”, Physical Review E 86(1): 016115.
• Shin, J.K. y J. Lorenz. 2010. “Tipping diffusivity in information accumulation systems: More links, less consensus”, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2010(06): P06005.
• Sîrbu, A., V. Loreto, V.D.P. Servedio y F. Tria. 2007. “Opinion dynamics: model, extensions and external effects”. Pp. 363-401 en Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Suiza: Springer, Cham.
• Smaldino, P. E. y J. M. Epstein. 2015. “Social conformity despite individual preferences for distinctiveness”, Royal Society Open Science 2(3): 140437.
• Sobkowicz, P. 2003. “Opinion formation in networked societies with strong leaders”, arXiv preprint arXiv:cond-mat/0311521. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0311521
• Sobkowicz, P. 2009. “Modeling opinion formation with physics tools: a call for closer link with reality”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(1): 11.
• Sobkowicz, P. 2010. “Effect of leader’s strategy on opinion formation in networked societies with local interactions”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 21(06): 839- 852.
• Sousa, A.O. 2004. “Bounded confidence model on a still growing scale-free network”, arXiv preprint arXiv:cond-mat/0406766. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0406766
• Sousa, A. O. 2005. “Consensus formation on a triad scale-free network”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 348: 701-710.
• Stauffer, D. 2002. “The Sznajd model of consensus building with limited persuasion”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 13(3): 315-317.
• Stauffer, D. 2003. “How to convince others: Monte Carlo simulations of the Sznajd model”. Pp. 147-155 en The Monte Carlo Method in the Physical Sciences, editado por J. E. Gubernatis. Los Alamos: American Institute of Physics.
• Stauffer, D. y J. S. Martins. 2004. “Simulation of Galam’s contrarian opinions on percolative lattices”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 334(3-4): 558-565.
• Stauffer, D., A. Sousa y C. Schulz. 2004. “Discretized opinion dynamics of the Deffuant model on scale-free networks”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 7(3).
• Sznajd-Weron, K. (2005). “Sznajd model and its applications”, Acta Physica Polonica B 36(8): 2537-2547.
• Sznajd-Weron, K. y J. Sznajd. 2000. “Opinion Evolution in a Closed Community”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 11(6): 1157-1165.
• Tessone, C. J., R. Toral, P. Amengual, H.S. Wio y M. San Miguel. 2004. “Neighborhood models of minority opinion spreading”, The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 39(4): 535-544.
• Tullock, G. 1974. The social dilemma: The economics of war and revolution. Blacksburg, VA: University Publications.
• Vázquez, F., P.L. Krapivsky y S. Redner. 2003. “Constrained opinion dynamics: freezing and slow evolution”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 36(3): 6168.
• Visser, P. S., G.Y. Bizer y J. A. Krosnick. 2006. “Exploring the latent structure of strength-related attitude attributes.” Pp. 1-60 en Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.38) editado por M. Zanna. New York: Academic Press.
• Watts, D. y P. S. Dodds. 2007. “Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation”, Journal of Consumer Research 34: 441-458.
• Watts, D. y P. S. Dodds. 2009. “Threshold models of social influence”. Pp. 475497 en The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, editado por P. Hedström y P. Bearman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Weisbuch, G., G. Deffuant, F. Amblard y J. P. Nadal. 2002. “Meet, Discuss and Segregate!”, Complexity 7(3):55- 63.
• Weisbuch, G., G. Deffuant, F. Amblard y J. P. Nadal. 2003. “Interacting agents and continuous opinions dynamics”. Pp. 225-242 en Heterogenous agents, interactions and economic performance, editado por R. Cowan y N. Jonard. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.