Sci-Hub, challenge for academic and research libraries

Bibliographic References

• Bendezú-Quispe, Guido; Nieto-Gutiérrez, Wendy; Pacheco-Mendoza, Josmel; Taype-Rondan, Alvaro (2016). “Sci-Hub and medical practice: an ethical dilemma in Peru”. The lancet global health, v. 4, n. 9, e608. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(16)30188-7
• Björk, Bo‐Christer (2017). “Gold, green, and black open access”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 173-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1096
• Bohannon, John (2016a). “The frustrated science student behind Sci-Hub”. Science, v. 352, n. 6285, p. 51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6285.511
• Bohannon, John (2016b). “Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone”. Science, v. 352, n. 6285, pp. 508-512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6285.508
• Bosman, Jeroen; Kramer, Bianca (2018). “Open access levels: A quantitative exploration using Web of Science and oaDOI data”. PeerJ preprints, 6, e3520v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3520v1
• Cochran, Angela (2016). “A funny thing happened on the way to OA”. The scholarly kitchen, 25 February. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/02/25/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-oa
• Crissinger, Sarah (2017). “Access to research and Sci-Hub: Creating opportunities for campus conversations on open access and ethics”. College & research libraries news, v. 78, n. 2, pp. 86-95. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.78.2.9621
• Custodians Online Campaign (2015). In solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-Hub. http://custodians.online
• De-Castro, Pablo (2016). “Breves notas sobre la conferencia anual 2016 de Liber en Helsinki”. Blog EPI, 12 July. http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/notas/breves-notas-sobre-la-conferencia-anual-2016-de-liber-enhelsinki-pablo-de-castro-liber-open-access-project-officer-miembro-del-grupo-thinkepi
• Elbakyan, Alexandra (2016). Why science is better with Communism? The case of Sci-Hub. Presentation. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc850001
• Elbakyan, Alexandra (2017). “Some facts on Sci-Hub that Wikipedia gets wrong”. Engineuring, 2 July. https://engineuring.wordpress.com/2017/07/02/some-facts-on-sci-hub-that-wikipedia-gets-wrong
• Elbakyan, Alexandra (2018). “Corrections to The Verge article about Sci-Hub: part 1”. Engineuring, 16 February. https://engineuring.wordpress.com/2018/02/16/corrections-to-the-verge-article-about-sci-hub-part-1
• Emery, Jill (2016). “Heard on the net: Open access rhapsody”. The Charleston advisor, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 41-42. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.18.1.41
• Esposito, Joseph (2017). “Sci-Hub moves to the center of the ecosystem”. The scholarly kitchen, 5 September. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/09/05/sci-hub-moves-center-ecosystem
• Faust, Jeremy S. (2016) “Sci-Hub. A solution to the problem of paywalls, or merely a diagnosis of a broken system?”. Annals of emergency medicine, v. 68, n. 1, pp. A15-A17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.05.010
• Fernández-Marcial, Viviana; Costa, Luis-Miguel; González-Solar, Llarina (2016). “Top universities, top libraries: Do research services in academic libraries contribute to university output?”. In: Library Leadership in a Sea of Change, 37th Iatul Conference, Halifax (Canada). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2016/spaces/2
• Gardner, Carolyn; Gardner, Gabriel (2015). “Bypassing interlibrary loan via Twitter: An exploration of #icanhazpdf requests”. In: ACRL 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/24847
• Gardner, Gabriel J.; McLaughlin, Stephen R.; Asher, Andrew D. (2017). “Shadow libraries and you: Sci-Hub usage and the future of ILL”. In: ACRL 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/30981
• Greco, Albert N. (2017). “The Kirtsaeng and Sci-Hub cases: The major U.S. copyright cases in the twenty-first century”. Publishing research quarterly, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 238-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9522-7
• Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian (2016). “Correlating the Sci-Hub data with World Bank indicators and identifying academic use”. The winnower, v. 5, e146485.57797. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.146485.57797
• Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian (2017). “Looking into Pandora’s box: The content of Sci-Hub and its usage”. F1000Research, v. 6, n. 541. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11366.1
• Himmelstein, Daniel S.; Rodriguez-Romero, Ariel; Levernier, Jacob G.; Munro, Thomas-Anthony; McLaughlin, Stephen-Reid; Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian; Greene, Casey S. (2018). “Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature”. eLife, v. 7, e32822. https://elifesciences.org/articles/32822
• Houle, Louis (2017). “Sci-Hub and LibGen: what if… why not?” In: IFLA WLIC 2017 Libraries. Solidarity. Society, 16-17 August, Gdansk (Poland). http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/1892
• Hoy, Matthew B. (2017). “Sci-Hub: What librarians should know and do about article piracy”. Medical reference services quarterly, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2017.1259918
• Khabsa, Madian; Giles, C. Lee (2014). “The number of scholarly documents on the public web”. PLoS one, v. 9, n. 5, e93949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093949
• Kirsop, Barbara; Chan, Leslie (2005). “Transforming access to research literature for developing countries”. Serials review, v. 31, n. 4, pp. 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2005.10764998
• Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie; Mongeon, Philippe (2015). “The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era”. PLoS one, v. 10, n. 6, e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
• Lawson, Stuart (2017). “Access, ethics and piracy”. Insights. The UKSG journal, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.333
• Machin-Mastromatteo, Juan D.; Uribe-Tirado, Alejandro; Romero-Ortiz, Maria E. (2016). “Piracy of scientific papers in Latin America”. Information development, v. 32, n. 55, pp. 1806-1814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916671080
• Marple, Holly (2018). “Parasite, pirate, and Robin Hood: Sci-Hub is disrupting the world of academic publishing”. The journal, v. 3, n. 2. https://theijournal.ca/index.php/ijournal/article/view/29480
• McKenzie, Lindsay (2017). “Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription journals are doomed, data analyst suggests”. Science news, 27 July. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan7164
• McNutt, Marcia (2016). “My love-hate of Sci-Hub”. Science, v. 352, n. 6285, pp. 497-497. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9419
• Meadows, Alice (2015). “Beyond open: Expanding access to scholarly content”. The journal of electronic publishing, v. 18, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.301
• Mejia, Christian R.; Valladares-Garrido, Mario J.; Miñan-Tapia, Armando; Serrano, Felipe T.; Tobler-Gómez, Liz E.; Pereda-Castro, William; Mendoza-Flores, Cynthia R.; Mundaca-Manay, Maria Y.; Valladares-Garrido, Danai (2017). “Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America”. PLoS one, v. 12, n. 10, e0185673. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185673
• Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Herman, Eti; Clark, David; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez‐Bravo, Blanca; Świgoń, Marzena (2018). “Sci-Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front”. Learned publishing, 1 November. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1206
• Novo, Lluís A. B.; Onishi, Viviani C. (2017). “Could Sci-Hub become a quicksand for authors?”. Information development, v. 33, n. 3, pp.324-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917703638
• Oakley, Meg (2016). Online piracy: Why Sci-Hub is disrupting scholarly publishing. Georgetown University Library. https://www.library.georgetown.edu/sites/default/files/sci-hub-intro.pdf
• Penn, Louise (2018). “Alternative ways of obtaining scholarly articles and the impact on traditional publishing models from a UK/European perspective”. Serials review, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2018.1433906
• Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason; Larivière, Vincent; Alperin, Juan-Pablo; Matthias, Lisa; Norlander, Bree; Farley, Ashley; West, Jevin; Haustein, Stefanie (2018). “The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles”. PeerJ, v. 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
• Priego, Ernesto (2016). “Signal, not solution: Notes on why Sci-Hub is not opening access”. The winnower, v. 5, e145624.49417. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.145624.49417
• Reichman, Hank (2016). “News: Is it legal?”. Journal of intellectual freedom and privacy, v. 1, n. 2-3, p. 50. https://doi.org/10.5860/jifp.v1i2-3.6173
• Ruff, Corinne (2016). “Librarians find themselves caught between journal pirates and publishers”. The chronicle of higher education, 18 February. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Librarians-Find-Themselves/235353
• Russell, Carrie; Sanchez, Ed (2016). “Sci-Hub unmasked: Piracy, information policy, and your library”. College & research libraries news, v. 77, n. 3, pp. 122-125. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.77.3.9457
• Sathe, Nila A.; Grady, Jenifer L.; Giuse, Nunzia B. (2002). “Print versus electronic journals: A preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes”. Journal of the Medical Library Association, v. 90, n. 2, pp. 235-243. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC100770
• Sparc (2018). Big deal cancellation tracking. https://sparcopen.org/our-work/big-deal-cancellation-tracking
• Steel, Graham (2016). “Wallets with a serious case of Stockholm syndrome: Sci-Hub and the future of scholarly communication”. The winnower, v. 5, e145677.73287. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.145677.73287
• Strielkowski, Wadim (2017). “Will the rise of Sci-Hub pave the road for the subscription-based access to publishing databases?”. Information development, v. 33, n. 5, pp. 540-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917728674
• Swartz, Aaron (2008). Guerilla open access manifesto. https://archive.org/details/GuerillaOpenAccessManifesto
• Tenopir, Carol; King, Donald W.; Edwards, Sheri; Wu, Lei (2009). “Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns”. Aslib proceedings, v. 61, n. 1, pp. 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910932267
• Travis, John (2016). “In survey, most give thumbs-up to pirated papers”. Science news, May 6th. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5704
• Triggle, Chris R.; Triggle, David J. (2016). “From Gutenberg to open science: An unfulfilled odyssey”. Drug development research, v. 78, n. 1, pp. 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21369
• Van-Noorden, Richard (2016) “Alexandra Elbakyan: Paper pirate”. Nature, v. 540, n. 7634. https://doi.org/10.1038/540507a
• Woolston, Chris (2016). “Paper piracy sparks online debate”. Nature, 2 May. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19841