Expresión de aprendizaje consciente e inconsciente mediante priming asociativo enmascarado

  1. Marcos-Malmierca, José Luis 1
  2. Barca Enríquez, Eduardo 1
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

Journal:
Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

ISSN: 2386-7418

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: XIV Congreso de Psicopedagogía. Área 1: APRENDIZAJE, MEMORIA Y MOTIVACIÓN

Issue: 1

Pages: 6-10

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17979/REIPE.2017.0.01.2122 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

This experiment was designed to assess associative learning with and without perceptual awareness, using an interstimulus interval of 305 milliseconds. Participants received repeated trials of two compatible stimuli sequences (E1A?E2A and E1B ? E2B), where E1 was a masked stimulus, and E2 an imperative stimulus for a reaction time task. Some probe trials of incompatible stimuli sequences were inserted among the compatible sequence trials during two testing sessions. Subsequently, subjects were classified as perceptually aware or perceptually unaware by means of a forced-choice identification task. The results showed associative learning only in perceptually unaware participants.

Bibliographic References

  • Abrams, R. L. & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts out-weigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118-124.
  • Ansorge, U., Fuchs, I., Khalid, S. & Kunde, W. (2011). No conflict control in the absence of awareness. Psychological Research, 75, 351-365.
  • Barbot, A. & Kouider, S. (2012). Longer is not better: nonconscious overstimulation reverses priming influences under interocular suppression. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 74, 174-184.
  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
  • Furedy, J. J. & Riley, D. M. (1987). Human pavlovian autonomic conditioning and the cognitive paradigm. In G. Davey (Ed.), Cognitive processes and pavlovian conditioning in humans (pp. 1-25). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Gratton, G., Coles, J. & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
  • Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C. & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699-1702.
  • Kiesel, A., Kunde, W. & Hoffmann, J. (2007a). Unconscious priming according to multiple S-R rules. Cognition, 104, 89-105.
  • Kiesel, A., Kunde, W. & Hoffmann, J. (2007b). Mechanisms of subliminal response priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 307-315.
  • Klapp, S. T. & Greenberg, L. A. (2009). Temporary activation of perceptual-motor associations: a stimulus-response interpretation of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 5, 1266-1285.
  • Klotz, W. & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
  • Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205.
  • Lovibond, P. F. & Shanks, D. R. (2002). The role of awareness in pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3-26.
  • Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238-300.
  • Marcos, J. L. (2007). Associative learning of discrimination with masked stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 38, 75-88.
  • Marcos, J. L. (2011). Effect of interstimulus interval on acquisition and expression of associative learning with masked stimuli. Psicologica, 32, 207-222.
  • Mattler, U. & Palmer, S. (2012). Time course of free-choice priming effects explained by a simple accumulator model. Cognition, 123, 347-360.
  • Moors, A. & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.
  • Neumann, O. & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umilta and M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV. Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing (pp. 123-150). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Reynvoet, B., Gevers, W. & Caessens, B. (2005). Unconscious primes activate motor codes through semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 991-1000.
  • Schlaghecken, F., Bowman, H. & Eimer, M. (2006). Dissociating local and global levels of perceptuo-motor control in masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 618-632.
  • Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman and R. Davis (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1-17). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Data source: Dialnet