Una revisión sobre la aplicación de estrategias para augmentar el input de la comunicación aumentativa y alternativa asistida en personas con trastornos del desarrollo

  1. María Luisa Gómez Taibo 1
  2. María Teresa García-Eligio de la Puente 2
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  2. 2 Universidad de La Habana
    info

    Universidad de La Habana

    La Habana, Cuba

    ROR https://ror.org/04204gr61

Revista:
Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

ISSN: 0214-4603

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 36

Número: 1

Páginas: 23-35

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.RLFA.2015.03.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acheson M.J. (2006). The effect of natural aided language stimulation on requesting desired objects or actions in children with autism spectrum disorder (Tesis doctoral, University of Cincinnati, 2006). OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center [consultado 29 Jul 2009]. Disponible en: http://www. ohiolink.edu/etd/view.cgi?acc num=ucin1147311601
  • Adamson, L. B., Romski, M. A., Deffebach, K. y Sevcik, R. A. (1992). Symbol vocabulary and the focus of conversations augmenting language development for youth with mental retardation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 35, 1333---1343.
  • Beck, A. R., Stoner, J. B. y Dennis, M. L. (2009). An investigation of aided language stimulation: Does it increase AAC use with adults with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(1), 42---54.
  • Beukelman, D. R. y Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Binger, C. y Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(1), 30---43.
  • Binger, C., Berens, J., Kent-Walsh, J. y Taylor, S. (2008). The effects of aided AAC interventions on AAC use, speech, and symbolic gestures. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29(2), 101---111.
  • Bruno, J. (2003). Test of Aided-Communication Symbol Performance. Solana Beach: Mayer-Johnson.
  • Bruno, J. y Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(4), 300---313.
  • Cafiero, J. M. (1995). Teaching parents of children with autism picture communication symbols as a natural language to decrease levels of family stress (Tesis doctoral, University of Toledo, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 56(07), 2636.
  • Cafiero, J. (1998). Communication power for individuals with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 113---121.
  • Cafiero, J. (2001). The effect of an augmentative communication intervention on the communication, behavior, and academic program of an adolescent with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 179---193.
  • Dada, S. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on the receptive language abilities of children with little or no functional speech [Tesis doctoral]. University of Pretoria.
  • Dada, S. y Alant, E. (2009). The effect of aided language stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 50---64.
  • Dexter, M. E. (1998). The effects of Aided Language Stimulation upon verbal output and augmentative communication during storybook reading for children with pervasive developmental disabilities (Tesis doctoral, The Johns Hopkins University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 56(07), 2636.
  • Drager, K. (2009). Aided modeling interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders who requiere AAC. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 114---120.
  • Drager, K., Postal, V., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C. y Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112---125.
  • Elder, P. S. y Goossens, C. (1994). Engineering training environments for interactive augmentative communication. Strategies for adolescents and adults who are moderately/severely developmentally delayed. Birmingham: Southeast Augmentative Communication. Conference Publications Clinician Series.
  • Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., et al. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Developmental Inventories: User’s guide and technical. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
  • Fey, M. (1986). Language Intervention with Young Children. San Diego: College-Hill Press.
  • Goossens, C. y Crain, S. (1986). Augmentative Communication Assessment Resources. Wauconda, IL: Don Johnston, Inc.
  • Goossens, C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14---26.
  • Goossens, C., Crain, S. y Elder, P. (1992). Engineering the preschool environment for interactive, symbolic communication. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.
  • Goossens, C., Jennings, D. y Kinahan, D. (2000). Facilitating strategies for group activities in engineered AAC classrooms. In Pre-conference workshop presented at the Ninth Biennial Conference of ISAAC Washington DC.
  • Harris, M. D. y Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(2), 155---167.
  • Hart, B. y Risley, T. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 411---420.
  • Hunt-Berg, M. (1996). Learning Graphic Symbols. The Roles of Visual Cues in Interaction [tesis doctoral no publicada]. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
  • Jonsson, A., Kristoffersson, L., Ferm, U. y Thunberg, G. (2011). The ComAlong Communication Boards: Parents’ use and experiences of Aided Language Stimulation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(2), 103---116.
  • Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C. y Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17(2), 187---200.
  • Romski, M. A. y Sevcik, R. (1992). Developing augmented language in children with severe mental retardation. In S. Warren y J. Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention. Vol. 1 (pp. 113---130). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Romski, M. A. y Sevcik, R. A. (1993). Language learning through augmented means: The process and its products. In A. P. Kaiser y D. B. Gray (Eds.), Communication and language intervention series. Vol. 2. Enhancing children’s communication: Research foundations for intervention (pp. 85---104). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Romski, M. A. y Sevcik, R. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 281---285.
  • Romski, M. A. y Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Romski, M. A. y Sevcik, R. A. (2003). Augmented input: Enhancing communication development. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 147---162). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A. y Wilkinson, K. M. (1994). Peer-directed communicative interactions of augmented language learners with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation,98, 527---538.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Robinson, B. y Bakeman, R. (1994). Adult-directed communications of youth with mental retardation using the System for Augmenting Language. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 37, 617---628.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Robinson, B. F., Mervis, C. B. y Bernard, J. (1995). Mapping the meaning of novel visual symbols by youth with moderate or severe mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 100, 391---402.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A. y Adamson, L. B. (1999). Communication patterns of youth with mental retardation with and without their speech-output communication devices. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104(3), 249---259.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Hyatt, A. y Cheslock, M. B. (2002). Enhancing communication competence in beginning communicators: Identifying a continuum of AAC language intervention strategies. In J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman, & J. C. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp. 1---23). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R. A. y Abbeduto, L. (2005). Communication patterns of individuals with moderate or severe cognitive disabilities: Interactions with unfamiliar partners. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110(3), 226---238.
  • Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Cheslock, M. y Barton, A. (2006). The system for augmenting language. AAC and Emerging Language Intervention. In R. J. McCauley y M. E. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of Language Disorders in Children (pp. 123---147). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., et al. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 350---364.
  • Rowland C. y Schweigert, P. (1990). Tangible symbol systems: Symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairments. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
  • Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A. y Adamson, L. B. (1994). Communication patterns of youth with moderate or severe mental retardation: Role of speech-output communication devices. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association on Mental Retardation New Orleans, LA.
  • Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., Watkins, R. V. y Deffebach, K. P. (1995). Adult partner-augmented communication input to youth with mental retardation using the System for Augmenting Language (SAL). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38, 902---912.
  • Sevcki, R. A., Romski, M. A. y Adamson, L. B. (1999). Measuring AAC interventions for individuals with severe developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15(1), 38---44.
  • Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A. y Adamson, L. B. (2004). Research directions in augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(21/22), 1323---1329.
  • Sigafoos, J. y Pennell, D. (1995). Parent and teacher assessment of receptive and expressive language in preschool children with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 329---335.
  • Stillman, R. D. y Battle, C. W. (1984). Developing pre-language communication in the severely handicapped: An interpretation of the van Dijk method. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5(3), 159---170.
  • Thunberg, G., Ahlsén, E. y Sandberg, A. D. (2007). Children with autistic spectrum disorders and speech-generating devices: Communication in different activities at home. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(6), 457---479.
  • Wilkinson, K. M., Romski, M. A. y Sevcik, R. A. (1994). Emergence of visual-graphic symbol combinations by youth with moderate or severe mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 883---895.
  • Wood, L. (1998). The impact of augmented input and elicited production on graphic symbol learning [tesis doctoral no publicada]. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
  • Wood, L., Lasker, J., Siegel-Causey, E., Beukelman, D. y Ball, L. (1998). Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 14(4), 261---267.