Action research in the communicative language classroomusing alternative assesment techniques with efl secondary-school students

  1. Lucía Fraga Viñas 1
  2. María Bobadilla Pérez 1
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

Journal:
Huarte de San Juan: Filología y Didáctica de la Lengua

ISSN: 2386-9143

Year of publication: 2015

Issue: 15

Pages: 67-77

Type: Article

More publications in: Huarte de San Juan: Filología y Didáctica de la Lengua

Abstract

The Council of Europe, through the Common European Framework of Reference for Language, Teaching and Assessment (CEFRL), has been promoting communicative competence since 2001. This boost has introduced some changes in the teaching-learning process of English as a Foreign Language is Spain: the methodological use of the communicative approach in the classrooms, the practice of the four skills in the class, and the theoretical implications that Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences theory has in the planning and design of classroom activities. But, in spite of that, academic results are still not very remarkable and the rates of academic failure are not decreasing since English is still a challenging subject for many Secondary School students. In addition, test evaluation is still the predominant assessment method in most of the schools. The current case study intends to provide the educational community with some results obtained from the implementation of some alternative assessment and evaluation methods in an actual high-school in Spain.

Bibliographic References

  • abbaS, Z. (2001): «Difficulties in Using Methods of Alternative Assessment in Teaching from Iraqi Instructors Points of View», Al­Faith Journal, 48, 2012, pp. 23-45.
  • council oF euroPe (2001): Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR) , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press..
  • dikli, S. (2003): «Assessment at a Distance: Traditional vs. Alternative Assessment», The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2.3, pp. 13-19.
  • elliot, S. N. (1995): «Creating Meaningful Performance Assessments», ERIC Digest E531: n. page. Eric Digest. Web. < http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED381985>.
  • gardner, H. (1989): «Educational Implications of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences», Educational Researcher, 18, pp. 4-10.
  • JaniScH, C.; liu, X.; akroFi, A. (2007): «Implementing Alternative Assessment: Opportunities and Obstacles», The Educational Forum, vol. 71, pp. 221-230.
  • louw, W. (2003): «My Love Affair with Alternative Assessment: Integrating Quality Assessment into OBE Courses for Distance Education», Progression, 25.2, pp. 21-28.
  • Mclaren, N.; Madrid, D.; bueno, A. (eds.), (2005): TELF in Secondary Education: handbook and workbook, Granada, Universidad de Granada.
  • Miller, N. (2002): Alternative Forms of Formative and Summative Assessment, edited by John Huston and David Whigham, Glasgow Calcedonian University.