¿Son los obreros idiotas e irracionales?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ackroyd, Stephen y Paul Thompson (1999), Organizational Misbehaviour, Londres, Sage.
• Aguiar, Francisco y Andrés De Francisco (2007), “Siete tesis sobre racionalidad, identidad y acción colectiva”, en Revista internacional de sociología, núm. 46.
• Alvesson, Mats y Stanley Deetz (1996), “Critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organizational studies”, en Clegg, S. et al., Handbook of organization studies, Londres: Sage.
• Alvesson, M. y H. Willmott [eds.] (1992), Critical Management Studies, Londres: Sage.
• Alvesson, Mats y Hugh Willmott (2002), “Identity regulation as organizational control: producing the appropriate individual”, en Journal of Management Studies, 39(5).
• Armstrong, Peter (2008), “Existential struggle and surplus value: Hugh Willmott on managerial subjectivities”, Paper presentado en Conference of practical criticism in the managerial social sciences, enero 2008.
• Bicchieri, Cristina (2006), The grammar of society. The nature and dynamics of social norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Boudon, Raymond (2001), “La sociología que realmente importa”, en Papers 72.
• Boudon, Raymond (2004), The poverty of relativism, Oxford: The Bardwell Press.
• Braverman, Harry (1974), Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century, Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
• Burawoy, Michael (1979), El consentimiento en la producción. Los cambios del proceso productivo en el capitalismo monopolista, Madrid: MTSS.
• Burrell, Gibson (1988), “Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis, II: the contribution of Michael Foucault”, en Organization studies, 9(2).
• Burrell, Gibson y Gareth Morgan (1987), Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life, Croft Road: Gower.
• Castillo, Carlos Alberto (1991), “Estudio introductorio”, en Gaudemar, J. P., El orden y la producción. Nacimiento y formas de la disciplina de fábrica, Madrid: Trotta.
• Casey, Catherine (1995), Work, self and society: after industrialism, London: Sage.
• Chia, Robert (1996), Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice, New York: de Gruyter.
• Clegg, Steward R. (1987), “The power of language and the language of power”, en Organizational studies, 8(1).
• Clegg, Steward R. (1989), Frameworks of power, Londres: Sage.
• Clegg, Steward et al. (1996), Handbook of organization studies, Londres: Sage.
• Collinson, David (1992), Managing the shop floor: Subjectivity,
• masculinity, and workplace culture, New York: de Gruyter.
• Collinson, David (1994), “Strategies of resistance. Power, knowledge and subjectivity in the workplace”, en Jermier, J. et al. (1994), Resistance and power in organisations, Londres: Routledge.
• Collinson, David (1999), “Surviving the Rigs: safety and surveillance on North Sea Oil installations”, en Organizations Studies, 20/4.
• Collinson, David (2003), “Identities and insecurities: selves at work”, en Organization, 10.
• Comay, Rebecca (1986), “Excavating the repressive hypothesis: aporias of liberation in Foucault”, en Telos, núm. 67.
• Cooper, Robert y Gibson Burrell (1998), “Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: an introduction”, en Organization Studies, vol. 9.
• Deetz, Stanley (1992), Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life, Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Du Gay, Paul (1993), “Entrepreneurial management in the public sector”, en Work, Employment and Society, 7/4.
• Edwards, Richard (1979), Contested terrain: the transformation on the workplace in the twentieth century, Londres: Heinemann.
• Elster, Jon (2007), Explaining social behavior. More nuts and bolts for the social sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Fernández, Carlos Jesús (2007a), “Posmodernidad y teoría crítica de la empresa: una presentación de los critical managment studies”, en Fernández, C. [ed.], Vigilar y organizar. Una introducción a los Critical Managment Studies, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
• Fernández, Carlos Jesús (2007b), “Estudios críticos de la gestión: una visión general”, en Fernández, Carlos Jesús [ed.], Vigilar y organizar. Una introducción a los Critical Managment Studies, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
• Fleming, Peter y André Spcier (2003), “Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance”, en Organization, 10, 1.
• Friedman, Andrew (1977), Industry and labour: class struggle at work and monopoly capitalism, Londres: MacMillan Press.
• Gergen, Kenneth J. (1992), “Organization theory in the Postmodern Era”, en Reed, Michael y Michael Hughes, Rethinking organization. New directions in organization theory and analysis, Londres: Sage.
• Giddens, Anthony (1981), A contemporary critique of historical materialism, Londres: MacMillan.
• Giddens, Anthony (1982), Profiles and critiques in social theory, Londres: MacMillan.
• Grey, Chris (1994), “Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline”. Sociology 28/2.
• Grey, Chris y Hugh Willmott [eds.] (2005), Critical Management Studies: A reader, Oxford: Oxford Universiy Press.
• Hollway, Wendy (1984), “Gender difference and the production of subjectivity”, en Henriques, J. et al., Changing the subject, Londres: Methuen.
• Hassard, John (1993), “Postmodernism and organizational analysis: an overview”, en Hassard y Parker [eds.] (1993), Postmodernism and Organizations, Londres: Sage.
• Holmer Nadesan, Majia (1997), “Constructing paper dolls: The discourse of personality testing in organizational practice”, en Communication Theory, 7.
• Hollway, Wendy (1984), “Fitting work: Psychological assessment in organizations”, en Henriques, Julian et al. [eds.], Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, Londres: Methuen.
• Jermier, John et al. (1994), “Introduction. Resistance and power in organizations: agency, subjectivity and the labour process”, en Resistance and power in organisations, Londres: Routledge.
• Jermier, John (1998), “Introduction: critical perspectives on organizational control”, en Administrative Science Quarterly, 43.
• Kitay, Jim (1997), “The labour process: still stuck? Still a perspective? Still useful?”, en Electronic Journal of Radical Organisation Theory, vol. 3, núm. 1.
• Knights, David (1997), “Organization Theory in the Age of Deconstruction: Dualism, Gender and Postmodernism Revisited”, en Organization Studies, 18.
• Knights, David y Theo Vurdubakis (1994), “Foucault, power, resistance and all that”, en Jermier, John et al. (1994), Resistance and power in organisations, Londres: Routledge.
• Knights, David y Hugh Willmott (1989a), Labour Process Theory, Londres: MacMillan.
• Knights, David y Hugh Willmott (1989b), “Poder y subjetividad en el trabajo: de la degradación a la dominación en las relaciones sociales”, en Fernández, C. [ed.], Vigilar y organizar. Una introducción a los Critical Managment Studies, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
• Kondo, Dorinne (1990), Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Kunda, Gideon (1992), Engineering culture: control and commitment in a high-tech corporation, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• León, Francisco José (2008), “Sujetos por su resistencia: análisis sociológico de una experiencia de trabajo bajo el sistema de producción por micromovimientos”, en Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, núm. 122.
• León, Francisco José (2009a), “La lógica de los trabajadores. Un estudio sobre la racionalidad, la autonomía y la coherencia de las prácticas y significados de los trabajadores”, en Revista Internacional de Sociología, vol. 67, núm. 1.
• León, Francisco José (2009b), “El compromiso limitado. Un estudio de caso sobre las razones estratégicas e identitarias de las acciones de resistencia y compromiso en el trabajo”, en Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, vol. 27, núm. 2.
• León, Francisco José (2010), “Peer loyalty and quota restriction as social norms. A case study of their emergence”, en Rationality and Society, 22, vol. 4 (en prensa).
• Linstead, Steve (1993), “Deconstruction in the study of organizations”, en Hassard y Parker [eds.] (1993), Postmodernism and organizations, Londres: Sage.
• Montes, Juan (2005), “Subordinación y dominación en los espacios de trabajo. Estudio sobre la disciplina y sus formas de expresión”, en Athenea Digital, 8.
• Mumby, Dennis K. (2005), “Theorizing resistance in organization studies. A dialectical approach”, en Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 19, núm. 1.
• O’Doherty, Damian y Hugh Willmott (2001), “Debating Labour Process Theory: the issue of subjectivity and the relevance of poststructuralism”, en Sociology, vol. 35, núm. 2.
• Parker, Martin (1999), “Capitalismo, subjetividad y ética: el debate sobre el análisis del proceso de trabajo”, en Fernández, C. [ed.], Vigilar y organizar. Una introducción a los Critical Managment Studies, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
• Poulantzas, Nicos (1979), State, power, socialism, London: New Left Books.
• Rose, Nicolas (1989), Governing the soul. The shaping of the private self, Londres: Routledge.
• Rosen, Michael (1988), “You asked for it: Christmas at the bosses’ expense”, en Journal of Management Studies, 25.
• Sewell, Graham y Barry Wilkinson (1992), “Someone to watch over me: Surveillance, discipline and the just in-time labour process’, en Sociology, 26/2.
• Scott, James (1985), Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance, Londres: Yale University Press.
• Scott, James (1987), “Resistance without protest and without organization: peasant opposition to the Islamic Zakat and the Christian Tithe”, en Comparative studies in society and history, vol. 29, núm. 3.
• Scott, James (1989), “Prestige as the public discourse of domination”, en Cultural Critique, núm. 12.
• Scott, James (1990), Los dominados y el arte de la resistencia, Tafalla: Txalaparta.
• Thompson, Paul (1993), “Postmodernism: Fatal distraction”, en Hassard y Parker [eds.] (1993), Postmodernism and organizations, Londres: Sage.
• Thompson, Paul y Stephen Ackroyd (1995), “All quiet on the workplace front? A critique of recent trends in british industrial sociology”, en Sociology, vol. 29, núm. 4.
• Tinker, Tony (2002), “Specters of Marx and Braverman in the twilight of postmodernist labour process research”, en Work, employment and society, vol. 16.
• Townley, Barbara (1993), “Performance appraisal and the emergence of management”, en Journal of Management Studies 3/2.
• Walby, Sylvia (1986), Patriarchy at work, Cambridge: Polity.
• Watson, Tony (1995), Sociology, work and industry, Londres: Routledge.
• Willmott, Hugh (1993), “La fuerza es la ignorancia, la esclavitud es la libertad: la gestión de la cultura en las organizaciones modernas”, en Fernández, Carlos Jesús [ed.], Vigilar y organizar. Una introducción a los Critical Managment Studies, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
• Willmott, Hugh (1994), “Bringing agency (back) into organizational analysis: responding to the crisis of (post)modernity”, en Hassard, J. y M. Parker, Towards a new theory of organizations, Londres: Routledge.
• Willmott, Hugh (1995), “From bravermania to schizophrenia: the d(is/ec)eased condition of subjectivity in labour process theory”, en 13th International Labour Process Conference, Blackpool.
• Witten, Marsha (1993), “Narrative and the culture of obedience at the workplace”, en Mumby, D. [ed.], Narrative and social control: Critical perspectives, Newbury Park: Sage.