Enhancing L2 Motivation and English Proficiency through Technology

  1. Gonzalez Mujico, Flordelis
  2. Lasagabaster, David
Revista:
Complutense Journal of English Studies

ISSN: 2386-3935

Año de publicación: 2019

Número: 27

Páginas: 59-78

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/CJES.62990 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Complutense Journal of English Studies

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Balancing and mastering the linguistic and academic demands of English teaching in higher education can become a difficult hurdle to surpass. Since curricula that integrates technology appears to provide an array of opportunities that promote engagement and language skills, it is worth examining how and whether L2 motivation, self-regulation and learning can be heightened through digital technologies. This paper describes a 6-week intervention programme conducted on 205 international students enrolled on an English for Academic Purposes course at a British university. Based on L2 imagery techniques and ePortfolios, the intervention proved to be of benefit to learner engagement and language acquisition.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abrami, Philip, Venkatesh, Vivek, Meyer, Elizabeth, and Anne C. Wade (2013). Using electronic portfolios to foster literacy and self-regulated learning skills in elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(4): 1188-1209.
  • Asker, Adel (2012). Future self-guides and language learning engagement of English-major secondary school students in Libya: understanding the interplay between possible selves and the L2 learning situation. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham.
  • Attwell, Graham (2007). The personal learning environments – The future of eLearning? eLearning Papers 2(1) http://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media11561. pdf Retrieved on 13.12.16.
  • Barrett, Helen. C (2009). Online personal learning environments: Structuring electronic portfolios for lifelong and life wide learning. On the Horizon 17(2): 142–152.
  • Cheng, Gary (2008). Implementation challenges of the English language ePortfolio system from various stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 37(1): 97-118.
  • Dafei, Deng (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Professional Teaching Articles 1-23.
  • Dörnyei, Zoltán (2009). The L2 Motivation Self System. In Dörnyei, Zoltán and Ema Ushioda, eds., 9-42.
  • Dörnyei, Zoltán and Letty Chan (2013). Motivation and vision: an analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two TLs. Language Learning 63(3): 437-462.
  • Dörnyei, Zoltán and Ema Ushioda (2009). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dörnyei, Zoltán and Ema Ushioda (2011). Teaching and Researching Motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
  • Hadfield, Jill and Zoltán Dörnyei (2013). Motivating Learning. Harlow: Longman.
  • Higgins, E Tory (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94: 319–340.
  • Hung, Hsiu-Ting (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 28(1): 81-96.
  • Iwaniec, Janina (2014). Motivation of pupils from southern Poland to learn English. System 45: 67-78.
  • Kim, Yoon-Kyoung and Tae-Young Kim (2011). The effect of Korean secondary school students’ perceptual learning styles and Ideal L2 self on motivated L2 behaviour and English proficiency. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 21–42.
  • Magid, Michael (2014). A Motivational Programme for Learners of English: An Application of the L2 Motivational Self System. In Csizér, Kata and Michael Magid, eds., 300-318.
  • Magid, Michael and Letty Chan (2012). Motivating English learners by helping them visualise their Ideal L2 Self: Lessons from two motivational programmes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 6(2): 113–125.
  • Markus, Hazel R. and Paula S. Nurius (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist 41: 954-969.
  • Meyer, Elizabeth, Abrami, Philip. C., Wade, Anne, Aslan, Ofran, and Louise Deault (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education 55: 84–91.
  • Murray, Garold (2013). Pedagogy of the possible: imagination, autonomy, and space. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 3(3): 377-396.
  • Oyserman, Daphna, Bybee, Deborah and Kathy Terry (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: how and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(1): 188–204.
  • Sampson, Richard (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self perceptual change. Language Teaching Research 16(3): 317–335.
  • Sheldon, Kennon M. and Sonja Lyubomirsky (2006). How to increase and sustain positive emotion: the effects of expressing gratitude and visualising best possible selves. Journal of Positive Psychology 1(2): 73–82.
  • Taguchi, Tatsuya, Magid, Michael, and Mostafa Papi (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System among Japanese, Chinese, and Iranian Learners of English: A Comparative Study. In Dörnyei, Zoltán and Ema Ushioda, eds., 66–97.
  • Teng, Lin. Sophie, and Lawrence Jun Zhang (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal 100(3): 674-701.
  • Ushioda, Ema (2014). Motivation Perspectives on the Self in SLA: A Developmental Perspective. In Mercer, Sarah and Marion Williams, eds., 140-154.
  • Waller, Laurel, and Mostafa Papi (2017). Motivation and feedback: how implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing 35: 54-65.
  • You, Chenjing, and Zoltán Dörnyei (2016). Language learning motivation in China: results of a large-scale stratified survey. Applied Linguistics 37(4): 495-519.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet