Bienestar emocional de los estudiantes universitarios: el papel de la orientación a metas y las percepciones de control

  1. Rodríguez, Susana 1
  2. Piñeiro, Isabel 1
  3. Regueiro, Bibiana 1
  4. Estévez, Iris 1
  5. Valle, Antonio 1
  6. Núñez, José Carlos 2
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Publicaciones: Facultad de Educación y Humanidades del Campus de Melilla

ISSN: 1577-4147

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 48

Número: 1

Páginas: 211-224

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.30827/PUBLICACIONES.V48I1.7324 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Publicaciones: Facultad de Educación y Humanidades del Campus de Melilla

Resumen

El propósito de este estudio es conocer la contribución de la controlabilidad del fracaso, las expectativas de éxito, la autoeficacia y la orientación a metas sobre el bienestar emocional. La muestra es de 982 estudiantes universitarios de seis titulaciones diferentes. Los resultados indican que la atribución de los fracasos a factores no controlables junto con la adopción de metas de evitación del rendimiento podría ser suficiente para mermar el bienestar emocional. Las expectativas de éxito, la atribución del fracaso a factores controlables y la percepción de autoeficacia estarían positivamente asociadas al bienestar emocional de los estudiantes en contextos universitarios. Las variables motivacionales empleadas aquí explican conjuntamente un 17.6% de la varianza de la ansiedad estado negativa.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arbuckle, J.L. (2009). Amos 18.0 User’s Guide. Crawfordville: Amos Development Corporation.
  • Efklides, A. y Volet, S.(2005). Emotional experiences during learning: Multiple, situated and dynamic. Learning and Instruction 15, 377-380.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.American Psychologist 56, 218-226.
  • Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R.yGoetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics —A “hopeless” issue?A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics.European Journal of Psychology of Education 22, 497-514.
  • Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. y Haag, L. (2006). Academic emotions from a social cognitive perspective: Antecedents and domain specificity of students’ affect in the context of Latin instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 289-308.
  • Goetz, T., Sticca, F., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K.y Elliot, A.J.(2016). Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach. Learning and Instruction 41, 115-125.
  • Linnenbrink-García, L.yPekrunReinhard.R. (2011).Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36, 1-3.
  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educational Psychology Review 18, 315-341.
  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., y Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test.Journal of educational Psychology, 98(3),583.
  • Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., y Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. En P. Schutz y R. Pekrun (eds.), Emotion in education(pp.13-36). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R.H. y Perry, R.P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology 102, 531-549.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R.P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M. y Molfenterd, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ).Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal 17, 287-316.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W. y Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37, 91-105.
  • Putwain, D.W., Sander, P. y Larkin, D. (2013).Using the 2×2 framework of achievement goals to predict achievement emotions and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences 25, 80-84.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., y McKeachie, W. J. (1991).A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
  • Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self- enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71–81.
  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., yLushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist.
  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. PsychologicalReview, 92(4),548.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet