Efectos de la intervención en conciencia fonológica y velocidad de denominación sobre el aprendizaje de la escritura
- González Seijas, Rosa María
- Cuetos Vega, Fernando 1
- Vilar, Juan
- Uceira Rey, Eva
-
1
Universidad de Oviedo
info
ISSN: 0210-2773
Year of publication: 2015
Volume: 43
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-8
Type: Article
More publications in: Aula abierta
Abstract
The aim of this research was to analyze the causal effect that intervention on phonological awareness and naming speed could have on learning to write. A total of 271 students participate (138 experimental group and 133 control group). The experimental group received instructions on phonological awareness and naming speed throughout three courses, and the control group followed the official curriculum. The instructions given to students of pre-school education (4 and 5 years old) and first grade of primary school (6 years old), were evaluated in writing with standardized test three years later. The experimental group obtained higher scores than the control group in the phonological and rapid naming tasks. And more interesting, the experimental group obtained better results in writing tasks. These results have important theoretical implications, as they show the relationship between phonological awareness and naming speed in learning to write. There are also educational implications, since it provides guidelines to facilitate the learning of writing in the classroom.
Bibliographic References
- Alburquerque, C. (2012). Rapid naming contributions to reading and writing acquisition of European Portuguese. Reading and Writing, 25, 775–797.
- Cuetos, F., Ramos, J. L. y Ruano, E. (2002). PROESC: batería de evaluación de los procesos de escritura. Madrid: TEA.
- Caravolas, M. (2004). Spelling development in alphabetic writing systems: A cross- linguistic perspective. European Psychologist, 9(1), 3–14.
- Defior, S. (2008). ¿Cómo facilitar el aprendizaje inicial de la lectoescritura? Papel de las habilidades fonológicas. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 31(3), 333–345.
- Defior, S. y Serrano, F. (2011). Procesos fonológicos explícitos e implícitos, lectura y dislexia. Revista Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias, 11(1), 79–94.
- De Jong, P. F. y van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77.
- Furnes, B. y Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 85–95.
- Gillon, G. T. (2004). Phonological awareness: From research to practice. New York: Guilford Press.
- Guerrero, P. y López, A. (1992). Vocabulario básico para la educación infantil. Madrid: Bruño.
- Hulme, Ch., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, N., Braun, A., Adams, J. y Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than honest —rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2–28.
- Justicia, F. (1995). El desarrollo del vocabulario. Diccionario de frecuencias. Universidad de Granada.
- Kessler, B. y Treiman, R. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–313.
- Landerl, K. y Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.
- Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S. y Doi, L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(2), 129–157.
- Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M. y Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–333.
- Manis, F. R. y Freedman, L. (2001). The relationship of naming speed to multiple reading reassures in disabled and normal readers. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 65–92). Timonium, MD: York Press.
- McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13–23.
- Mejía de Eslava, L. y Eslava-Cobos, J. (2008). Conciencia fonológica y aprendizaje lector. Instituto Colombiano de Neurociencias. Acta Neurológica Colombiana, 24.
- National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington: National Institute for Literacy.
- Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Simpson, I., Caravolas, M. y Defior, S. (2011). Letter knowledge, phoneme awareness and RAN as predictors of reading fluency in Spanish. In 10th Symposium of Psycholinguistics San Sebastián, April 13th-16th.
- Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R. y McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development? Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 3–26.
- Ramos, J. L. y Cuadrado, I. (2006). Prueba para la evaluación del conocimiento fonológico. PECO. Madrid: EOS.
- Romani, C., Olson, A. y di Betta, A. M. (2005). Spelling disorders. In M. J. Snowling y C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 431–448). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
- Savage, R., Pillay, V. y Melidona, S. (2008). Rapid serial naming is a unique predictor of spelling in children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 235–250.
- Shanahan, T. (2004). Overcoming the dominance of communication: Writing to think and to learn. In T. L. Jetton y J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice. New York: Guilford Press.
- Strattman, K. y Hodson, B. W. (2005). Variables that influence decoding and spelling in beginning readers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21, 165–190.
- Suárez-Coalla, P., García-de-Castro, M. y Cuetos, F. (2013). Variables predictoras de la lectura y la escritura en castellano. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36(1), 77–89.
- Sunseth, K. y Bowers, P. G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(4), 401–429.
- Swanson, H. L. y Berninger, V. (1996). Invidual differences in children’s working memory and writing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358–385.
- Thomson, J. y Hogan, T. (2009). Future advances in the early detection of reading risk: Subgroups, dynamic relations, and advanced methodologies. Epilogue Special Edition “Advances in the Early Detection of Reading Risk”. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(4), 383–386.
- Treiman, R. (1998). Why spelling? The benefits of incorporating spelling into beginning reading instruction. In J. Metsala y L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (289-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Treiman, R. (2004). Phonology and spelling. In P. Bryant y T. Nunes (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 54–76). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Verhagen, W., Aarnoutse, C. y van Leeuwe, J. (2010). Spelling and word recognition in Grades 1 and 2: Relations to phonological awareness and naming speed in Dutch children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 59–80.
- Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. y Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73–87.
- Wolf, M. y Denckla, M. B. (2005). The rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests. Examiner’s manual. Austin: Pro-Ed.
- Wolf, M., OR´ ourke, A., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P. y Morris, R. (2002). The Second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming speed deficits and developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15, 43–72.
- Yuste, C. (2005a). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales, BADyG-I. Madrid: CEPE.
- Yus. (2005b). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales, BADyG-E1. Madrid: CEPE.